Criteria of progress for information systems design theories

Aier, Stephan; Fischer, Christian

doi:10.1007/s10257-010-0130-8

Cited by 37 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(43 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The evaluation criteria to be used for the evaluation of artifacts should be independent of an artifact type in order to determine internal consistency, broad purpose and scope [31]. One set of evaluation criteria should focus on the relevance of the artifact, for example, is an artifact expected to be applicable in practice [32].…”

Section: Research Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using a user experience evaluation framework for eModeration

Staden

Biljon

Kroeze

2017

2017 Conference on Information Communication Technology and Society (ICTAS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The use of eModeration (of examination scripts) can improve the efficiency of the examination moderation, while simultaneously lowering the risk of misplacing or delaying the moderation process. Despite the potential benefits of using an eModerate system in terms of optimising examination procedures, the implementation and application of such online moderation systems in the South African context is limited. Various factors could be contributing towards the resistance to the implementation and adoption of eModerate systems in higher education institutions. These factors include human factors as well as technical and organisational resistance to change. This study focuses on the human factors involved in eModeration (user experience) and attempts to answer the following research question: How can the User Experience Evaluation Framework for eModeration be utilised within the context of higher education institutions in South Africa? The research used a Design Science Research methodology, which included the design, development as well as testing of the User Experience Evaluation Framework for eModeration. This paper will report on identified issues pertaining to the User Experience Evaluation Framework for eModeration during the evaluation phase. The research was conducted at Midrand Graduate Institute (MGI), now trading as Pearson Institute of Higher Education, a private higher education institute in South Africa. The data generation methods included interviews with eModerators from different faculties within a private higher education institution. This paper makes a theoretical contribution to this area of study by identifying the problems that users might have with the implementation of the User Experience Evaluation Framework for eModeration as well as providing some insights into the user experience of eModerators.

show abstract

Section: Research Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using a user experience evaluation framework for eModeration

Staden

Biljon

Kroeze

2017

2017 Conference on Information Communication Technology and Society (ICTAS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this respect, the technically oriented stream has developed the interesting idea of ''design theories'' as a major objective of design research (e.g., Fischer et al 2010;Aier and Fischer 2011). Design theories basically refer to the processes and methods of designing a class of artefacts that offer general insights into how to design workable solutions for the entire problem class.…”

Section: Description Of Design Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Approaches in e-HRM: Categorisation and Analysis

Strohmeier

2013

Progress in IS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electronic Human Resource Management (e-HRM) is a new interdisciplinary field of research at the intersection of Human Resources (HR) and Information Systems (IS). Research in e-HRM is currently based on diverse research approaches from HR and IS, its ''parent disciplines'', as well as other disciplines. The frequent implicitness and thus uncertainty of the used research approaches, however, is disadvantageous for future e-HRM research because it obstructs a conscious and instructed selection and adoption of research approaches as well as mutual understanding and cooperation between different research approaches. The current chapter thus aims to categorise (which approaches are available?) and analyse (which characteristics and potential do these approaches demonstrate?) e-HRM research approaches. To this end, a brief framework of conceptual criteria is derived that allows research approaches in e-HRM to be categorised and analysed. Based on this, a categorisation and analysis of four major approaches, i.e., critical research, interpretive research, post-positive research and design research, is offered, and the possibilities for adopting these approaches in e-HRM research are described.

show abstract

“…We considered that to gain insights about what can be expected from a designed artefact, we could use artefacts evaluation criteria. We selected those criteria by reasoning on criteria of progress for information systems theories proposed by Aier and Fischer [14]. We based the questions of the questionnaire on the artefacts evaluation criteria we selected, and then gathered these questions in themes to ease the interviewing process.…”

Section: Observational Approach Overview: An Interpretive Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2010, Aier and Fischer proposed a set of Criteria of Progress for Information Systems Design Theories [14]. We call this set of criteria CriProISDT 1 .…”

Section: Identification Of the Interview Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In developing the observation approach, we chose the interpretive research approach as a starting point, where qualitative research data pertaining to the use and performance of the specific BPMM, will be collected with semi-structured interviews. The original contribution of this paper is the way in which we defined the themes and questions of these interviews: we selected a subset of criteria of progress for information systems theories proposed by Aier and Fischer [14]. We then performed the interviews to investigate the use of DEMO in practice in several projects and contexts by several types of stakeholders acquainted with DEMO.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Qualitative Research Approach to Obtain Insight in Business Process Modelling Methods in Practice

Décosse¹,

Molnar²,

Proper³

2013

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Part 4: Enterprise Modelling Approaches and Tools for Agility and FlexibilityInternational audienceIn this paper we are concerned with the development of an observational research approach to gain insights into the performance of Business Process Modelling Methods (BPMMs) in practice. In developing this observational approach, we have adopted an interpretive research approach. More specifically, this involved the design of a questionnaire to conduct semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative research data about the performance of BPMMs. Since a BPMM is a designed artefact, we also investigated Design Science Research literature to identify criteria to appreciate the performance of BPMMs in practice. As a result, the questionnaire that was used to guide the interview is based on a subset of criteria of progress for information systems theories, while the observational research approach we adopted involves the collection of qualitative data from multiple stakeholder types. As a next step, the resulting questionnaire was used to evaluate the performance an actual BPMM in practical use; the DEMO method. Though the analysis of the collected qualitative data of the DEMO case has not been fully performed yet, we already foresee that part of the information we collected provides new insights compared to existing studies about DEMO, as is the fact that a variety of types of stakeholders have been approached to observe the use of DEMO

show abstract

Criteria of progress for information systems design theories

Cited by 37 publications

References 26 publications

Using a user experience evaluation framework for eModeration

Using a user experience evaluation framework for eModeration

Research Approaches in e-HRM: Categorisation and Analysis

A Qualitative Research Approach to Obtain Insight in Business Process Modelling Methods in Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About