2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria to Screen for Traumatic Cervical Spine Instability: A Consensus of Chiropractic Radiologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this study's aim was to produce a usable set of standards, it was necessary to apply consensus‐building methods in subsequent rounds. The use of dichotomous rating, Likert scale 24 and ranking of elements 25 reduced the lists of standards to 10 per scan type 27 . These methods have been used successfully in other Delphi studies to refine large amounts of respondent data into pragmatic item lists 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this study's aim was to produce a usable set of standards, it was necessary to apply consensus‐building methods in subsequent rounds. The use of dichotomous rating, Likert scale 24 and ranking of elements 25 reduced the lists of standards to 10 per scan type 27 . These methods have been used successfully in other Delphi studies to refine large amounts of respondent data into pragmatic item lists 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical work, scholars generally use intervertebral displacement (> 3.5 mm) and/or intervertebral angulation (> 11 degrees) as indicators of instability of hangman fracture and the lower cervical spine [23,24]. Lockey [25] suggested that dynamic X-rays of the cervical spine should be taken as a basic examination to accurately eliminate cervical instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical fractures and traumatic cervical spine instability can occur in patients who suffered severe spinal injuries. In this study, X-ray was used to determine whether the horizontal displacement between adjacent vertebral bodies was greater than 3.5 mm to evaluate the existence of cervical hyperextension injury [139].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%