2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532001000600008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criterious Preparation and Characterization of Earthworm-composts in View of Animal Waste Recycling: Part II. A Synergistic Utilization of EPR and ¹H NMR Spectroscopies on the Characterization of Humic Acids from Vermicomposts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fe (II) centers correspond to more symmetrical coordination sites in the halloysite structure and the Fe (I) centers to less symmetrical ones. All the spectra also present a broad absorption line in higher magnetic field, corresponding to overlapped lines of spin-spin coupling (bipolar interaction), proportional to r À3 , where r is the distance between two magnetic dipoles that interact with each other [27]. The broad line indicates the presence of magnetic dipole-dipole interactions among Fe 3+ ion centers and is referred to as a concentrated domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Fe (II) centers correspond to more symmetrical coordination sites in the halloysite structure and the Fe (I) centers to less symmetrical ones. All the spectra also present a broad absorption line in higher magnetic field, corresponding to overlapped lines of spin-spin coupling (bipolar interaction), proportional to r À3 , where r is the distance between two magnetic dipoles that interact with each other [27]. The broad line indicates the presence of magnetic dipole-dipole interactions among Fe 3+ ion centers and is referred to as a concentrated domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…12 Observing the values of the EPR parameters for the other Cu II complexation site (Table 2), we note that they differ significantly from the more familiar copper complexes. For example, the value of the A 33 hyperfine coupling constant is appreciably lower than the value of A || generally found for a copper(II) ion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A adição desse solo à amostra 6 causou deformação na linha de base do sinal do RLO (Figura 3a) e aumento da ΔH PP (Figura 3b). Essas duas alterações são atribuídas ao surgimento de uma linha larga centrada em g ≈ 2,2 (dado não apresentado), gerada pela superposição de linhas decorrentes de interações dipolares entre estruturas ferromagnéticas (Guimarães et al, 2001). Contudo, não se exclui a possibilidade de alargamento espectral associado com o aumento da taxa de relaxação por interação dipolar (Novotny & Martin-Neto, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified