2023
DOI: 10.1111/aej.12780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of a new system to classify root and canal morphology — A systematic review

Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed,
Giampiero Rossi‐Fedele,
Paul Michael Howell Dummer

Abstract: A novel system to classify root and canal morphology was recently introduced (Ahmed et al. 2017). This systematic review aimed to answer the following research question: Does the Ahmed et al. system provide a more accurate and practical classification of root and canal anatomy compared to other classifications? A literature search was conducted in Google Scholar, Scopus and Wiley Online Library to identify the citation counts for the article entitled ‘A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The root and canal coding system introduced by Ahmed et al ( 64 ) was based on a critical analysis of the literature and the identification of deficiencies in previous classifications, such as the inability to define the number of roots in anterior and premolar teeth, inability to address complex canal configurations, etc. These issues have been discussed in a recent systematic review ( 70 ). However, it is obvious that the same strategy cannot be applied when attempting to classify pulp chamber anatomy because of the limited number of classifications used to characterise the anatomy of the pulp chamber (which are only related to the pulp chamber floor), and the limited literature available on the topic using high resolution imaging devices (such as micro-CT and CBCT).…”
Section: General Concepts and Steps For Developing A Classification S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root and canal coding system introduced by Ahmed et al ( 64 ) was based on a critical analysis of the literature and the identification of deficiencies in previous classifications, such as the inability to define the number of roots in anterior and premolar teeth, inability to address complex canal configurations, etc. These issues have been discussed in a recent systematic review ( 70 ). However, it is obvious that the same strategy cannot be applied when attempting to classify pulp chamber anatomy because of the limited number of classifications used to characterise the anatomy of the pulp chamber (which are only related to the pulp chamber floor), and the limited literature available on the topic using high resolution imaging devices (such as micro-CT and CBCT).…”
Section: General Concepts and Steps For Developing A Classification S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, mandibular incisors have not been previously assessed in the Spanish population. Though the Vertucci classification ( 14 ) has been used widely, the Ahmed et al ( 13 ) classification has been purported to describe the root and canal morphology more accurately and practically ( 15 ), as allows to characterize all canal configurations and tooth anomalies ( 16 ). Similarly, the level of canal splitting has attracted attention due to its outstanding clinical relevance as it would support canal location when required ( 15 , 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%