2007
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.8.2032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Analysis of Dimension Reduction by a Moment Closure Method in a Population Density Approach to Neural Network Modeling

Abstract: Computational techniques within the population density function (PDF) framework have provided time-saving alternatives to classical Monte Carlo simulations of neural network activity. Efficiency of the PDF method is lost as the underlying neuron model is made more realistic and the number of state variables increases. In a detailed theoretical and computational study, we elucidate strengths and weaknesses of dimension reduction by a particular moment closure method (Cai, Tao, Shelley, & McLaughlin, 2004; Cai, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not straightforward to determine how noise at the single cell level translates into noise at the population or network level. One approach is to formulate the dynamics of a population of spiking neurons in terms of the evolution of the probability density of membrane potentialsthe so-called population density method [51,52,70,[191][192][193][194][195][196][197]. Typically, a very simple model of a spiking neuron is used such as the integrate-and-fire (IF) model [48] and the network topology is assumed to be either fully connected or sparsely connected.…”
Section: Stochastic Neural Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not straightforward to determine how noise at the single cell level translates into noise at the population or network level. One approach is to formulate the dynamics of a population of spiking neurons in terms of the evolution of the probability density of membrane potentialsthe so-called population density method [51,52,70,[191][192][193][194][195][196][197]. Typically, a very simple model of a spiking neuron is used such as the integrate-and-fire (IF) model [48] and the network topology is assumed to be either fully connected or sparsely connected.…”
Section: Stochastic Neural Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, when there are multiple fixed points, the truncated moment equations fail to take into account exponentially small transitions between fixed points, which underlie the asymptotically slow approach to the true steady state of the full probabilistic model (assuming that it exists). It would be interesting to explore the issue of rare event or large deviation statistics within the context of population density methods, where failure of moment closure even occurs in the absence of multiple fixed points [52]. neurons in the ith population can be extracted by operating on a state vector with the number operator Φ † i Φ i and using the commutation relations,…”
Section: Hamiltonian Dynamics and Rare Event Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, as the complexity of the individual neuron model increases, the gain in efficiency of the population density method decreases, and this has motivated the development of moment closure schemes. However, as recently shown by Ly and Tranchina [52], considerable care must be taken when carrying out the dimension reduction, since it can lead to an ill-posed problem over a wide range of physiological parameters. That is, the truncated moment equations may not support a steady-state solution even though a steady-state probability density exists for the full system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches have a long history in the physical sciences [47,48] and recently in the life sciences [36,45,49]. Here we provide an alternative approach based on the probability density (or FokkerPlanck) equation of the stochastic neural network, rather than the stochastic integrals we considered in the main text.…”
Section: Appendix: Alternative Reduction Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%