2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical assessment of hydrodynamic load models for a monopile structure in finite water depth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rainey load model is derived on energy conservation grounds only, and does not make any assumptions on the incoming waves, except for the fact that the cylinder is slender and does not modify the wave surface, also called the wavy lid assumption. While this point force differs from the F ψ in Kristiansen and Faltinsen [17], a recent study of Suja-Thauvin et al [18] concluded that the third-harmonic content of the two terms agree for large waves.…”
Section: The Force Modelsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The Rainey load model is derived on energy conservation grounds only, and does not make any assumptions on the incoming waves, except for the fact that the cylinder is slender and does not modify the wave surface, also called the wavy lid assumption. While this point force differs from the F ψ in Kristiansen and Faltinsen [17], a recent study of Suja-Thauvin et al [18] concluded that the third-harmonic content of the two terms agree for large waves.…”
Section: The Force Modelsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…and Faltinsen [23], a recent study of Suja-Thauvin et al [24] concluded that the third-harmonic content of the two terms agree for large waves. No slamming model is included in the present force computations.…”
Section: The Force Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Both of these force models include a point load at the free surface which is not included here due to its third-order magnitude. A recent study by Suja-Thauvin et al (2020) suggested that although these two point loads appear to differ by a factor of 8, their third-harmonic force for large-amplitude regular waves are remarkably close.…”
Section: Journal Pre-proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, the peak loads values are usually underpredicted due the missing higher-order corrections, and second, the nonlinear load contributions at the super and sub harmonic frequencies outside the linear spectrum are not included. Recent examples of these effects are given in Suja-Thauvin et al (2020), Pierella et al (2021) and Wang et al (2021). For design of offshore wind turbine substructures, the IEC61400-3-1 (2019) standard thus requires to take nonlinear kinematics into account for the ULS loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%