2021
DOI: 10.1108/jfra-12-2019-0175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical assessment of Islamic financial assets pricing in South-East Asia: evidence from NARDL modelling

Abstract: Purpose This study aims to critically examine the pricing of Islamic financial assets (Sharīʿah-compliant assets, Sharīʿah-compliant securities, Sharīʿah-compliant financing and Sukuk) in the three South-East Asia countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei to provide necessary information to the policymakers and Islamic finance investors for making a sound decision. Design/methodology/approach This study used secondary data and used the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lags (NARDL) model to estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seventh article (Salami, 2021) discussed, the pricing behaviour of Islamic financing assets and the implementation of AAOIFI and the IFSB, as suggested by Greuning and Iqbal (2008) This study urges AAOIFI and IFSB to be more efficient in providing more enriching information rather than relying heavily on financial report of Islamic financial sectors. However, the study critically examined the pricing of Islamic financial assets (Sharīʿah-compliant assets, Sharīʿah-compliant securities, Sharīʿah-compliant financing and Sukuk) in the three Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei and provided necessary information to the policymakers and Islamic finance investors for making a sound decision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seventh article (Salami, 2021) discussed, the pricing behaviour of Islamic financing assets and the implementation of AAOIFI and the IFSB, as suggested by Greuning and Iqbal (2008) This study urges AAOIFI and IFSB to be more efficient in providing more enriching information rather than relying heavily on financial report of Islamic financial sectors. However, the study critically examined the pricing of Islamic financial assets (Sharīʿah-compliant assets, Sharīʿah-compliant securities, Sharīʿah-compliant financing and Sukuk) in the three Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei and provided necessary information to the policymakers and Islamic finance investors for making a sound decision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study critically examined the pricing of Islamic financial assets (Sharīʿah-compliant assets, Sharīʿah-compliant securities, Sharīʿah-compliant financing and Sukuk) in the three Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei and provided necessary information to the policymakers and Islamic finance investors for making a sound decision. Salami (2021), concluded that despite the finding that price adjustment for the pair of Islamic financial assets is faster especially when the relationship is significant, unfair price adjustment exists. Pricing of Sukuk was found to be asymmetrical for Malaysia and Indonesia studies while symmetrical pricing in the case of Brunei study.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%