2014
DOI: 10.3390/atoms2010015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Assessment of Theoretical Calculations of Atomic Structure and Transition Probabilities: An Experimenter’s View

Abstract: The interpretation of atomic observations by theory and the testing of computational predictions by experiment are interactive processes. It is necessary to gain experience with "the other side" before claims of achievement can be validated and judged. The discussion covers some general problems in the field as well as many specific examples, mostly organized by isoelectronic sequence, of what level of accuracy recently has been reached or which atomic structure or level lifetime problem needs more attention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 275 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The red line indicates the value obtained from ab-initio calculations, adjusted to the experimental transition energy. The blue line indicates the value obtained by additionally taking into account the anomalous magnetic moment of the electronImage reproduced with permission from Träbert (2014a)…”
Section: Atomic Calculations and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The red line indicates the value obtained from ab-initio calculations, adjusted to the experimental transition energy. The blue line indicates the value obtained by additionally taking into account the anomalous magnetic moment of the electronImage reproduced with permission from Träbert (2014a)…”
Section: Atomic Calculations and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This offers an excellent way to benchmark/validate the atomic structure calculations. For general reviews of how atomic structure calculations can be assessed by, e.g., lifetime measurements see, e.g., Träbert (2010, 2014a). Träbert (2005) reviewed lifetime measurements for the important iron ions.…”
Section: Atomic Calculations and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For radiative rates, on the order hand, there are fewer experimental results and the benchmarking of theoretical methods has been performed with ions other than neonlike [87][88][89][90][91]; a very few cases where neonlike high-Z ions were studied [92,93] are the exception. (There also have been studies of transition rates in low-Z ions of the Ne isoelectronic sequence, with reviews that illustrate the pitfalls of experiment and calculation [94][95][96]). Thus, theoretical radiative rates in neonlike ions often differ considerably when calculated with various theoretical methods [40,52,[58][59][60]64] even while excitation energies may be in good agreement.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For highly charged ions, there are few experimental methods available to determine transition rates. Lifetimes for long-lived states of the ground configuration or the lowest excited configurations have been determined in accurate storage-ring and trapping experiments (see for example, the review by Träbert [59]) and are used for benchmarking. Lifetimes for a large range of short-lived states have been determined using beam-foil spectroscopy [60].…”
Section: Transition Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%