2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical assessment of two approaches for evaluating contacts between super-quadric shaped particles in DEM simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional ways to construct an irregular particle require the user to place spherical elements within a meshed polyhedral body (e.g., Wang et al, 2007;Matsushima et al, 2009;Ferellec and McDowell, 2010;Fukuoka et al, 2013), which consumes high computational costs with large numbers of components (spheres) involved (Hubbard, 1996;Song et al, 2006). Although techniques using 3D polyhedral (Latham et al, 2001) or continuous superquadric functions (Williams and Pentland, 1992;Lu et al, 2012) provide a straightforward way to generate irregular particle shapes, complex contact-detection algorithms are needed, leading to deterioration in simulation speed as particle complexity increases (Johnson et al, 2004). In order to overcome these difficulties, a stochastic digital packing algorithm was developed (Jia and Williams, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional ways to construct an irregular particle require the user to place spherical elements within a meshed polyhedral body (e.g., Wang et al, 2007;Matsushima et al, 2009;Ferellec and McDowell, 2010;Fukuoka et al, 2013), which consumes high computational costs with large numbers of components (spheres) involved (Hubbard, 1996;Song et al, 2006). Although techniques using 3D polyhedral (Latham et al, 2001) or continuous superquadric functions (Williams and Pentland, 1992;Lu et al, 2012) provide a straightforward way to generate irregular particle shapes, complex contact-detection algorithms are needed, leading to deterioration in simulation speed as particle complexity increases (Johnson et al, 2004). In order to overcome these difficulties, a stochastic digital packing algorithm was developed (Jia and Williams, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the development of SHM for its application in DEM is still in progress, the number of direct contributions that use SHM in DEM is limited (Garboczi, 2011;Garboczi and Bullard, 2013;Zhou et al, 2015). In this regard, two strategies can be followed to incorporate SHM into DEM codes: (1) development of shape-independent universal models with the use of continuous function representations (CFR) to analytically describe real shapes (Lu et al, 2012), or (2) development of shape-specific DEM models such as a sphero-polyhedrals or MS using approximated SH expressions.…”
Section: Role and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact between analytically well-defined shapes is basically restricted to super-ellipsoidal (Wellmann et al, 2008) or super-quadric shaped particles (Lu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Direct Application Of Shm To Demmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particles are usually spherical in shape but more detailed geometrical representations may be achieved through the use of polygons, implicit surfaces and parametric surfaces (Wachs et al, 2012., Fraige, et al, 2008., Hogue & Newland, 1994& Lu et al, 2012.…”
Section: The Discrete Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%