1973
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.7.1967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Behavior of a Classical Heisenberg Ferromagnet with Many Degrees of Freedom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
105
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(8)] diverges for h → 0 as h −1/2 . This divergence of the uniform longitudinal susceptibility of a three-dimensional Heisenberg magnet in the ordered state is not widely appreciated, although it was noticed a long time ago 2,3 and has been confirmed by renormalization group calculations for the classical Heisenberg ferromagnet 19,20 and perturbative calculations for the corresponding quantum model. 21,22 Due to this divergence, the Gibbs free energy G(M ) of the Heisenberg ferromagnet in D = 3 does not have the generic form (7).…”
Section: Linear Spin Waves At Constant Order Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(8)] diverges for h → 0 as h −1/2 . This divergence of the uniform longitudinal susceptibility of a three-dimensional Heisenberg magnet in the ordered state is not widely appreciated, although it was noticed a long time ago 2,3 and has been confirmed by renormalization group calculations for the classical Heisenberg ferromagnet 19,20 and perturbative calculations for the corresponding quantum model. 21,22 Due to this divergence, the Gibbs free energy G(M ) of the Heisenberg ferromagnet in D = 3 does not have the generic form (7).…”
Section: Linear Spin Waves At Constant Order Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14) is proportional to (m − m 0 ) 3 , which can be traced to the fact that the inverse susceptibility vanishes. By contrast, in D > 4 the uniform longitudinal susceptibility of the Heisenberg ferromagnet is finite, 19,20 so that in this case the Gibbs free energy has indeed the generic form (7).…”
Section: Linear Spin Waves At Constant Order Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power counting shows that at nonzero temperature, and for dimensions d longitudinal susceptibility to diverge everywhere in the ferromagnetic phase, so χ L is fundamentally different in the ferromagnetic phase than in the paramagnetic one. 17 Ultimately this implies the superconducting transition temperature can be very different in the two phases, and it is this aspect that previous theories missed.…”
Section: 5 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Heisenberg ferromagnet (or in any magnet with a continuous rotation symmetry in spin space), the transverse spin waves or magnons are massless and couple to the longitudinal susceptibility χ L . 17 This effect is most easily illustrated within a nonlinear sigma-model description of the ferromagnet, 18 which treats the order parameter m as a vector of fixed length m, and parametrizes it as m = m(π 1 (x), π 2 (x), σ(x)), with σ 2 + π …”
Section: 5 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting analogy in this context is the corresponding OP susceptibility in a classical Heisenberg ferromagnet. Due to a coupling between the longitudinal and transverse magnetization fluctuations the longitudinal magnetic susceptibility χ L (i.e., the OP susceptibility) for 2 < d < 4 diverges everywhere in the ordered phase as 1/k 4−d [31]. This results from a one-loop contribution to χ L that is a wave-number convolution of two Goldstone modes, each of which scales as an inverse wave number squared.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%