2012
DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2012.706111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Border Studies: Broadening and Deepening the ‘Lines in the Sand' Agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
96
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…We conceptualise borders as multiple and dynamic, producing and being produced by the shifting power relationship among individuals and institutions involved, both directly and indirectly, in their formation and operation. Border is, hence, as Parker and Vaughan-Williams (2012) conclude never simply '"present", nor fully established, nor obviously accessible. Rather, the border is manifold and in a constant state of becoming (728)'; it is always 'located, partial and incomplete', and cannot be fixed, stable or universal (Bauder 2011(Bauder , 1129.…”
Section: Conceptualising Borders and Power Geometries In Tnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conceptualise borders as multiple and dynamic, producing and being produced by the shifting power relationship among individuals and institutions involved, both directly and indirectly, in their formation and operation. Border is, hence, as Parker and Vaughan-Williams (2012) conclude never simply '"present", nor fully established, nor obviously accessible. Rather, the border is manifold and in a constant state of becoming (728)'; it is always 'located, partial and incomplete', and cannot be fixed, stable or universal (Bauder 2011(Bauder , 1129.…”
Section: Conceptualising Borders and Power Geometries In Tnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disability refers to an effect or performing agency that emerges when irregular bodies interact with disabling material practices [45]. A case in point is provided by borders as material processes or practices, as bordering practices [7][8][9]. These practices signify and over-determine the work of bordering and its symbolic and material/semiotic implications.…”
Section: Migrant Bodies In Crypts: a Dis/abling Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By emphasising the performative production of zoopolitical spaces -such as the Tripoli zoo-turned-processing-centre -I suggest that it is possible to open up new avenues for critiquing the limits of humanitarian border security beyond the dominant rhetoric/reality frame. As such, the article responds to extant calls for the development of alternative border imaginaries apposite to the complexities of bordering practices in global politics (Johnson et al 2011;Mezzadra and Neilson 2013;Parker and Vaughan-Williams 2012;Rumford 2008;Walker 2010), the further elaboration of the (post)biopolitical paradigm (Debrix and Barder 2012;Wolfe 2012), and the exploration of how Derrida's zoopolitical treatment of the relationship between biopolitics, sovereignty and the human/animal distinction might help 'inform a new, critical geography' (Rasmussen 2013(Rasmussen : 1130. Crucially, however, the analysis departs from recent efforts to bring 'the animal' and animal-human relations back in to political geography and border-making (Philo and Wilbert 2000;Brown and Rasmussen 2010;Collard 2012;Sundberg 2011 example, Balibar 1998Balibar , 2009Bialasiewicz 2011;Bigo 2001;Guild 2009;van Houtum 2010;Rumford 2008;Sidaway 2006;Walker 2000;Walters 2002Walters , 2011.…”
Section: Recent Lectures Published Posthumously Asmentioning
confidence: 99%