2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical consideration of buildings' environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Planning the life cycle of a building (or building elements) becomes imperative to support the decision-making process, and this is demonstrated by the numerous studies in which optimization strategies, based on very different approaches, are developed in the literature, ranging from genetic algorithms to combined Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and LCC procedures [6][7][8][9]. This allows an increased awareness of the burden of both the costs and environmental impacts of alternative technological and design solutions at every stage of the life cycle (from the raw materials supplied for the construction process to the demolition at the end of its useful life) [10][11][12][13][14]. In Italy, the attempts to apply technical-economic evaluations on energy saving strategies are numerous and are not only limited to the building envelope components but also extend to the technical systems, which are designed to maintain comfort conditions [15][16][17].…”
Section: Life Cycle Cost Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning the life cycle of a building (or building elements) becomes imperative to support the decision-making process, and this is demonstrated by the numerous studies in which optimization strategies, based on very different approaches, are developed in the literature, ranging from genetic algorithms to combined Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and LCC procedures [6][7][8][9]. This allows an increased awareness of the burden of both the costs and environmental impacts of alternative technological and design solutions at every stage of the life cycle (from the raw materials supplied for the construction process to the demolition at the end of its useful life) [10][11][12][13][14]. In Italy, the attempts to apply technical-economic evaluations on energy saving strategies are numerous and are not only limited to the building envelope components but also extend to the technical systems, which are designed to maintain comfort conditions [15][16][17].…”
Section: Life Cycle Cost Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works addressed the management of mechanical equipment status considering the BIM authoring perspective [58]. However, as far as the management of the buildings' equipment is concerned, most studies focused on refurbishment methods based on BIM [59], while research on their life cycle maintenance activities is poorly addressed [42].…”
Section: The Bim Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, these issues have also received greater attention in the construction sector, focusing on the development of solutions for sustainable buildings [41]. In fact, most studies have investigated the application of a life-cycle thinking approach to improve the environmental performances of buildings [42]. Whereas a few studies have addressed facility management by means of the PSS approach, discussing its integration with BIM solutions has only occurred thus far at a general level [43,44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing timber buildings can be a good solution for sustainable and circular cities. Hossain and Ng indicate that in comparison to residential buildings constructed with concrete, about 25% lower carbon emission level can be achieved if residential buildings are made of wood (Hossain & Ng, 2018). Therefore, wood can be considered as a circular material, additionally being renewable and thus sustainable as well.…”
Section: Circular Construction In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%