2019
DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2018.1530704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Conversations on Social Justice in Undergraduate Mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online learning also allows students to communicate with other students and teachers without being limited by time (Dumford & Miller, 2018). Moreover, discussion with the online learning platform allows students to reflect on themselves and collaborate with other students to broaden their understanding of learning material (Alexander et al, 2019). Students could accept the diversity of views of a material topic through discussions using online learning platforms because students accept explanatory arguments from the teachers and other students (Kashefi et al, 2012;Naidoo et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Opportunities Mathematics Teachers Have To Improve the Quality Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online learning also allows students to communicate with other students and teachers without being limited by time (Dumford & Miller, 2018). Moreover, discussion with the online learning platform allows students to reflect on themselves and collaborate with other students to broaden their understanding of learning material (Alexander et al, 2019). Students could accept the diversity of views of a material topic through discussions using online learning platforms because students accept explanatory arguments from the teachers and other students (Kashefi et al, 2012;Naidoo et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Opportunities Mathematics Teachers Have To Improve the Quality Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their analysis of social justice lessons taught by student teachers, Garii & Rule (2009) observed that many student teachers struggled to balance math and social justice goals, framing content in social justice topics without actually delving into the social justice issues, or focusing on the social justice issue without dedicating enough time to make sure the students understood the math content. In fact, balancing math and social justice goals was a theme in much of the literature we reviewed (e.g., Alexander et al, 2019;Appelbaum & Davila, 2007;Bartell, 2013;Gregson, 2013;Gutstein, 2006a;Turner, 2003;Turner & Strawhun, 2013).…”
Section: Inclusively Relevant Math Environments 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concerns are not unfounded; Gutstein (2006c) wrote candidly about his mixed experiences with administrators. However, TLMSJ is becoming a more common approach, including in teacher education programs and professional organizations (e.g., Alexander et al, 2019;Cochran-Smith et al, 2009). Garii and Rule (2009) recommended emphasizing with stakeholders how the TLMSJ approach helps students to make personally meaningful connections that will improve their learning.…”
Section: Overcoming Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%