Critical current behavior in bending and tensile stressed Nb&amp;lt;inf&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/inf&amp;gt;Sn composites at temperatures below 4.2 K

Seibt, E.; Turowski, P.; Springer, E.

doi:10.1109/tmag.1981.1061364

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lubell states that N = 1. and multifilamentary niobium tin in a bronze matrix. Tables i 1_7 » [9][10][11] and 2 present the material parameters for the materials in Fig. 1.…”

Section: Reduced Critical Temperature Versus Reduced Critical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generation of the J/sub c/, H/sub c/, T/sub c/ surface for commercial superconductor using reduced-state parameters

Green¹

1988

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report presents a method for calculating the 3 , H , T surface for Type II superconductors. The method requires that one knows T at zero current and field, H " at zero current and temperature, and J at at least one temperature and field. The theory presented in this report agrees with measured data quite well over virtually the entire J , H , T surface given the value of J versus H at one or two temperatures. This report presents calculated and measured values of 0 versus T and B for niobium titanium, niobium zirconium, niobium tin, niobium titanium tin, niobium tantalum tin, vanadium zirconium hafnium, and vanadium gallium. Good agreement of theory with measured data was obtained for commercial niobium titanium and niobium tin. TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND 1 THE REDUCED-CRITICAL-STATE METHOD 2 Reduced Critical Temperature Versus Reduced Critical Field 3 Reduced He£ Versus Reduced T c for Various Commercial Superconductors, Fig. 1 5 Selection of T c (0) and B c2 (0) 8 The J c , B, T Surface 14 THE TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF H cl , COHERENCE DISTANCE AND PENETRATION DEPTH 15 CRITICAL CURRENT DENSITY AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE AND MAGNETIC INDUCTION FOR NIOBIUM TITANIUM 17 The J c Versus B at 4.2 K 18 J c Versus B for a Modern Niobium Titanium Conductor, Fig. 4 21 Reduced J c Versus B for Various Samples of Niobium Titanium, Fig. 5 Calculation of J c for Other Values of Temperature Low-Field Temperature Dependence The Paraboloid Temperature Fit at Temperatures Below 3.5 K J c Versus B and T for a Niobium 44.0 w% Titanium Conductor, Fig. 10 34 J c Versus B and T for a Niobium 46.5 w% Titanium Conductor, Fig. 11 J c Versus B and T for a Niobium 52.7 w% Titanium Conductor, Fig. 13

show abstract

“…Lubell states that N = 1. and multifilamentary niobium tin in a bronze matrix. Tables i 1_7 » [9][10][11] and 2 present the material parameters for the materials in Fig. 1.…”

Section: Reduced Critical Temperature Versus Reduced Critical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generation of the J/sub c/, H/sub c/, T/sub c/ surface for commercial superconductor using reduced-state parameters

Green¹

1988

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Critical current behavior in bending and tensile stressed Nb<inf>3</inf>Sn composites at temperatures below 4.2 K

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

Generation of the J/sub c/, H/sub c/, T/sub c/ surface for commercial superconductor using reduced-state parameters

Generation of the J/sub c/, H/sub c/, T/sub c/ surface for commercial superconductor using reduced-state parameters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About