1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.16.1196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Currents and Surface Superconductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This slight variation in T c may be due to the different effective time scales involved in magnetic and electrical measurements. The possible surface superconductivity [16,17] of these intermetallic compounds is also not excluded. For comparison of resistivity results with the magnetic 2 θ Intensity (arb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This slight variation in T c may be due to the different effective time scales involved in magnetic and electrical measurements. The possible surface superconductivity [16,17] of these intermetallic compounds is also not excluded. For comparison of resistivity results with the magnetic 2 θ Intensity (arb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The critical field ͑H c ͒ at the low- 15 of the superconductor is expected to contribute strongly or from the surface superconductivity. 16 Recently it has been proposed that in a quasi-one-dimensional superconducting wire, such hysteresis might appear due to splitting of the band of single electron states in a series of subbands. 17 Detail discussion about the hysteresis in the light of the proposed theory is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Clean Superconducting In Nanowires Encapsulated Within Insulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fink and Barnes 18 proposed instead to define the critical current by the condition that the Gibbs free energy in the critical state is equal to that of the normal state. This hypothesis gave apparently better agreement with experiments and was therefore used in several papers, [19][20][21] but it now seems that there is experimental evidence against it. 8 From the theorist's point of view it is difficult to see how the free-energy criterion used by Fink and Barnes can be fitted into the GL scheme, which should allow one to predict realistic critical currents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%