2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical data-driven decision making: A conceptual model of data use for equity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A decade ago, Coburn and Turner (2011) noted the field's lack of an evidentiary basis for data‐use practice. Much work has been done over the past ten years to help us better understand the high variability of data‐use practice (Datnow & Hubbard, 2016), the nuanced differences between DDDM and teachers' assessment literacy (Xu & Brown, 2016), and how critical notions of DDDM can move from deficit approaches to those focused on promoting equity (Dodman et al, 2021). Of note, a more recent literature review on DDDM indicated two findings relevant to our study.…”
Section: The Qas Study: Framing the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A decade ago, Coburn and Turner (2011) noted the field's lack of an evidentiary basis for data‐use practice. Much work has been done over the past ten years to help us better understand the high variability of data‐use practice (Datnow & Hubbard, 2016), the nuanced differences between DDDM and teachers' assessment literacy (Xu & Brown, 2016), and how critical notions of DDDM can move from deficit approaches to those focused on promoting equity (Dodman et al, 2021). Of note, a more recent literature review on DDDM indicated two findings relevant to our study.…”
Section: The Qas Study: Framing the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model of educational data use was theorized as a way of addressing inequities among students. Unfortunately, literature from the past two decades has shown that the use of data with this approach has often exacerbated inequalities, partly because certain subpopulations are singled out for remediation and viewed with a deficit lens (Diamond, 2012; Horn, 2016; Settlage & Meadows, 2002) and partly because the use of data is not neutral, but situated in relation to histories, incentives, and other contextual forces (Dodman et al, 2021; Wang, 2019). In some instances, the focus on “instructional management” (Horn et al, 2015) has resulted in teachers shifting toward didactic instruction to maximize test scores with little concern for students' sensemaking of core disciplinary ideas or engagement with disciplinary practices.…”
Section: Background Literature and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCLB guidelines require state education authorities to publish disaggregated data from standardized tests (Dodman et al, 2021;Skrla et al, 2004). This allows transferability from this study because researchers can adapt variables, determine relationships, and make judgments in educational studies of their own .…”
Section: Transferabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under President George W. Bush, in 2001, the federal government enacted the NCLB Act, mandating public schools to participate in accountability methods and assessments to quantify student performance (Dodman et al, 2021;Farmer et al, 2006;Klein, 2015). NCLB was the largest educational reform since the 1960s, designed to boost overall student achievement and reduce achievement gaps between disaggregated groups of students (Dodman et al, 2019;Farmer et al, 2006;Skrla et al, 2004).…”
Section: No Child Left Behindmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation