2019
DOI: 10.18608/jla.2019.63.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Data Studies, Abstraction & Learning Analytics

Abstract: This editorial introduces a special section of the Journal of Learning Analytics, for which Neil Selwyn's keynote address to LAK '18 has been written up as an article, "What's the problem with learning analytics?" His claims and arguments are engaged in commentaries from Alfred Essa, Rebecca Ferguson, Paul Prinsloo, and Carolyn Rosé, who provide diverse perspectives on Selwyn's proposals and arguments, from applause to refutation. Reflecting on the debate, I note some of the tensions to be resolved for learnin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other Dimensions (Second and Third) embraced relatively critical perspectives with respect to the existing forms of data usage, which can be connected with emerging literature on the ethical and power issues relating to the form in which data are collected and manipulated in the techno-structure [29][30][31][32]. The fourth dimension, which could be linked to the research strand just mentioned, was placed in a separate area due to its specific nature relating data usage in education [56,57]. In this sense, some authors advocate for smart data usage in higher education, taking the form of learning analytics and its impact on students' self-regulation, drop-out prevention, personalization of learning, and informing learning design [41,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two other Dimensions (Second and Third) embraced relatively critical perspectives with respect to the existing forms of data usage, which can be connected with emerging literature on the ethical and power issues relating to the form in which data are collected and manipulated in the techno-structure [29][30][31][32]. The fourth dimension, which could be linked to the research strand just mentioned, was placed in a separate area due to its specific nature relating data usage in education [56,57]. In this sense, some authors advocate for smart data usage in higher education, taking the form of learning analytics and its impact on students' self-regulation, drop-out prevention, personalization of learning, and informing learning design [41,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic has followed a similar pattern of concern, with the attention put on academics' ability to handle students' digital data. Nevertheless, while the issue of data literacy to deal with learning analytics has been raised by some authors, [41,54] a comprehensive training over learning analytics and their implications for teachers and learners' data ethics seem to be far from the mainstream [55][56][57].…”
Section: Is Data Literacy a Catalyst Of Social Justice?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The special section contains a robust dialogue between Selwyn and four experts in the field of learning analytics (Carolyn Rosé, Al Essa, Paul Prinsloo, and Rebecca Ferguson) about the "dark side" of learning analytics. The key points and tensions raised are summarized in the guest editorial for the section (Buckingham Shum, 2019), which also points to the nature of our field as a design science, and the concomitant responsibility to "think in terms of the ripples that [our] inventions create at multiple levels of the sociotechnical infrastructure that constitutes 'education'" (p. 8).…”
Section: Equity Justice and Inclusion In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Selwyn, 2020, p. 4 In 2019, this journal published a dialogue and scholarly reflection about a necessary and unresolved question: "What's the problem with learning analytics?" (Buckingham Shum, 2019). The JLA dialogue featured learning analytics (LA) scholars who commented on Selwyn's (2019) keynote address to the 2018 International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge in which he asked a series of critical questions, including these: "What are the 'ideologies' and 'politics' of learning analytics technologies?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%