2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/740/2/80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Differences and Clues in Eta Car's 2009 Event,

Abstract: We monitored Eta Carinae with HST WFPC2 and Gemini GMOS throughout the 2009 spectroscopic event, which was expected to differ from its predecessor in 2003). Here we report major observed differences between events, and their implications. Some of these results were quite unexpected. (1) The UV brightness minimum was much deeper in 2009. This suggests that physical conditions in the early stages of an event depend on different parameters than the "normal" inter-event wind. Extra mass ejection from the primary s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
105
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The only caveat is that we do not account for any possible ionization of η A 's pre-shock wind to He iii by soft Xrays produced in the 420 km s −1 η A shock. However, any such He iii region near the WWIR zone at times around apastron is very likely to be negligible in extent, if it exists at all, as evidenced by the absence of any significant detectable He ii λ4686 emission in η Car during its spectroscopic high state (Mehner et al 2011;Teodoro et al 2012).…”
Section: Influence Of the Primary Star η Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only caveat is that we do not account for any possible ionization of η A 's pre-shock wind to He iii by soft Xrays produced in the 420 km s −1 η A shock. However, any such He iii region near the WWIR zone at times around apastron is very likely to be negligible in extent, if it exists at all, as evidenced by the absence of any significant detectable He ii λ4686 emission in η Car during its spectroscopic high state (Mehner et al 2011;Teodoro et al 2012).…”
Section: Influence Of the Primary Star η Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between the events provide valuable clues to their physics and the stellar system. We reported the differences between the 2003 and 2009 events and their implications in Mehner et al (2011b). Periastron passages may be triggering the long-term changes observed in η Car's light curves and spectra over the past two decades (Mehner et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Strong He ii λ4686 emission appears and disappears at critical times of the X-ray light curve and may be related to a shock break-up (Davidson 2002;Soker 2003;Soker & Behar 2006;Martin et al 2006a;Mehner et al 2011b). The line profiles and line strengths of hydrogen and helium also show intricate (and not well understood) behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the binary or binary wind-wind collision zone were reported by many authors (e.g., Damineli 1996;Damineli et al 1997Damineli et al , 1998Damineli et al , 2000Damineli et al , 2008bDavidson 1997;Davidson et al 2005Davidson et al , 2015Smith & Gehrz 2000;Smith et al 2004;Smith 2010;Pittard & Corcoran 2002;Corcoran et al 1997Corcoran et al , 2001Corcoran 2005;Ishibashi et al 1999;Soker 2003Soker , 2007Weis et al 2005;Gull et al 2006Gull et al , 2009Gull et al , 2011Gull et al , 2016Nielsen et al 2007;Weigelt et al 2007; Kashi & Soker 2007, 2009aParkin et al 2009;Groh et al 2010Groh et al , 2012bMadura & Owocki 2010;Madura et al 2012Madura et al , 2013Mehner et al 2010aMehner et al , 2011Mehner et al , 2012Mehner et al , 2015Richardson et al 2010;Teodoro et al 2013Teodoro et al , 2016Clementel et al 2015a,b;Hamaguchi et al 2016). The X-ray...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%