2014
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2014-29-01-p031-040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical discussion of light scattering and microscopy techniques for CNC particle sizing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these measurements 247 provide a useful approximation to average particle size in order to establish comparisons 248 between similar samples (Fraschini et al 2014 found for 65% acid, although in this case, cellulase positively influenced this parameter, 260 as well as it interacted with both time and temperature. 261…”
Section: Starting Fibers and Enzymatic Treatment 198mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, these measurements 247 provide a useful approximation to average particle size in order to establish comparisons 248 between similar samples (Fraschini et al 2014 found for 65% acid, although in this case, cellulase positively influenced this parameter, 260 as well as it interacted with both time and temperature. 261…”
Section: Starting Fibers and Enzymatic Treatment 198mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning average particle size, generally, DLS measurements do not provide a real 245 measurement of particle size, particularly when considering rod-like structures such as 246 nanocrystalline cellulose (Fraschini et al 2014). Nevertheless, these measurements 247 provide a useful approximation to average particle size in order to establish comparisons 248 between similar samples (Fraschini et al 2014 found for 65% acid, although in this case, cellulase positively influenced this parameter, 260 as well as it interacted with both time and temperature.…”
Section: Starting Fibers and Enzymatic Treatment 198mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É pertinente salientar a importância de estudos de produção de nanocristais de celulose com tamanhos específicos ou de seleção das dimensões desses durante seu processo de purificação. Fraschini et al (2014) reportaram que, como já se iniciou a produção industrial de NCC com uma fábrica da CelluForce TM Inc., o tamanho das partículas logo se tornará um parâmetro de controle de qualidade tendo em vista uma possível legislação regulatória no futuro. Além disso, os pesquisadores também indicam a necessidade de os whiskers estarem bem dispersos na matriz em que serão colocados para a síntese de compósitos e, entre outros fatores, o tamanho da carga influenciará na dispersão.…”
Section: Comprimentounclassified
“…In the very recent work by Gamelas et al the DLS hydrodynamic diameter, as an equivalent spherical diameter, was used to estimate the nanofibrils length assuming a cylinder with the same volume and with the diameter (width) assessed by AFM (Gamelas et al 2015). In the work by Fraschini et al with the anizometric cellulose microfibrils or whiskers, the hydrodynamic radius determined by DLS was considered only as an indicative measure of the 'apparent' size of the dynamic hydrated/solvated particle (Fraschini et al 2014). It was also pointed that in the case of rod-like particles, such as cellulose nanocrystals, a slight change in the length will directly affect the measured DLS size while changes in the cross-section will hardly affect the diffusion velocity.…”
Section: Analysis By Sem and Dlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size distribution profile of acetylated MFC indicated a slight shift towards lower sizes for both fractions. Despite of high demand, the standard methods or validated techniques for the size evaluation of polydisperse nanomaterials with a high aspect ratio, including cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils, are still under development (Gamelas et al 2015;Fraschini et al 2014). In the very recent work by Gamelas et al the DLS hydrodynamic diameter, as an equivalent spherical diameter, was used to estimate the nanofibrils length assuming a cylinder with the same volume and with the diameter (width) assessed by AFM (Gamelas et al 2015).…”
Section: Analysis By Sem and Dlsmentioning
confidence: 99%