2019
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Earthquake Response of 2DOF Elastic-Perfectly Plastic Model Under Multiple Impulse as Substitute for Long-Duration Earthquake Ground Motions

Abstract: An equi-spaced consecutive impulse input is treated as a simplified representative for a long-duration earthquake ground motion. The key property of such input can be captured approximately by using harmonic waves. An approximate closed-form solution is derived for the elastic-plastic response of a two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) system under the "critical multiple impulse input" based on some assumptions. The 2DOF system is assumed to consist of an elastic-perfectly plastic restoring-force characteristic in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where V is the velocity amplitude, δ(t) is the Dirac delta function and t 0 is the time interval of two impulses. Some investigations using the double impulse have been made for single-degree-offreedom (SDOF) models (Kojima and Takewaki, 2015;Akehashi et al, 2018a,b), investigations on MDOF models are extremely limited (Saotome et al, 2018;Shiomi et al, 2018;Takewaki, 2019, 2020). This may result from the fact that the simple energy balance law for the simple evaluation of the maximum response cannot be expected in MDOF models because of the phase lag.…”
Section: Critical Double Impulsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where V is the velocity amplitude, δ(t) is the Dirac delta function and t 0 is the time interval of two impulses. Some investigations using the double impulse have been made for single-degree-offreedom (SDOF) models (Kojima and Takewaki, 2015;Akehashi et al, 2018a,b), investigations on MDOF models are extremely limited (Saotome et al, 2018;Shiomi et al, 2018;Takewaki, 2019, 2020). This may result from the fact that the simple energy balance law for the simple evaluation of the maximum response cannot be expected in MDOF models because of the phase lag.…”
Section: Critical Double Impulsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1A shows the acceleration, velocity and displacement of the double impulse together with those of the corresponding one-cycle sine wave of acceleration. While several investigations using the double impulse have been made for single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) models Takewaki, 2015, 2016;Kojima et al, 2017;Akehashi et al, 2018a,b), researches on MDOF models are few (Taniguchi et al, 2016; Saotome et al, 2018;Shiomi et al, 2018). This is due to the fact that the simple energy balance law for the simple derivation of the maximum response is difficult to apply for MDOF models because of the phase lag.…”
Section: Double Impulse and Its Critical Input Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] The critical responses under MI have been investigated for elastic-plastic MDOF models so far. [22,23] However, the use of MI may lead to the overestimation of the acceleration responses under the corresponding multi-cycle sine wave (MSW) as a representative of long-duration ground motions due to its impulsive nature. Since an impulse input equally and simultaneously excites all the eigenmode responses, floor accelerations are apt to become excessive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%