1991
DOI: 10.2307/3430855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Effective Methods to Detect Genotoxic Carcinogens and Neoplasm-Promoting Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Be that as it may, the relatively high prevalence of foci of cellular alteration in the liver of dab from Stn 3, coupled with prominent mitotic activity and little evidence of apoptosis, collectively suggests a toxic effect with at least a reduction in those homeostatic mechanisms that regulate normal liver growth. Whether the environmental triggers are genotoxic or epigenetic carcinogens, promoters or enhancing factors, etc., remains to be established (see Weisburger & Williams 1991). In parallel studies to this one, Chipman et al (1992) found no evidence of genotoxic liver damage in dab sampled along the transect.…”
Section: Stnmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Be that as it may, the relatively high prevalence of foci of cellular alteration in the liver of dab from Stn 3, coupled with prominent mitotic activity and little evidence of apoptosis, collectively suggests a toxic effect with at least a reduction in those homeostatic mechanisms that regulate normal liver growth. Whether the environmental triggers are genotoxic or epigenetic carcinogens, promoters or enhancing factors, etc., remains to be established (see Weisburger & Williams 1991). In parallel studies to this one, Chipman et al (1992) found no evidence of genotoxic liver damage in dab sampled along the transect.…”
Section: Stnmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The most commonly reported are gamma-gluta-myl transpeptidase (GGT), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), the cytochrome P-450s, iron exclusion, and oncogene/tumor suppressor gene expression. A large body of research also exists on DNA-carcinogen adducts in fish, and readers are referred to other reference sources (53,187,209).…”
Section: Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also known that there are some disadvantages of the Ames test system. Firstly, it is a short term test which can give false results; both positive and negative false results (Weisburger & Williams, 1991). Secondly, Salmonella is a prokaryotic organism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%