2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.195122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical examination of quantum oscillations in SmB6

Abstract: We critically review the results of magnetic torque measurements on SmB6 that show quantum oscillations. Similar studies have been given two different interpretations. One interpretation is based on the existence of metallic surface states, while the second interpretation is in terms of a three-dimensional Fermi-surface involving neutral fermionic excitations. We suggest that the low-field oscillations that are seen by both groups for B fields as small as 6 T might be due to metallic surface states. The high-f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broad classes of models that have been proposed to explain bulk quantum oscillations in unconventional insulators include categories of gapped models, and models characterised by in-gap low energy excitations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. An analysis of the temperature-dependence of the quantum oscillation amplitude provides us with vital information to distinguish between classes of gapped and gapless models to describe quantum oscillations in the unconventional insulating phase.…”
Section: Field-induced Metallic Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Broad classes of models that have been proposed to explain bulk quantum oscillations in unconventional insulators include categories of gapped models, and models characterised by in-gap low energy excitations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. An analysis of the temperature-dependence of the quantum oscillation amplitude provides us with vital information to distinguish between classes of gapped and gapless models to describe quantum oscillations in the unconventional insulating phase.…”
Section: Field-induced Metallic Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the simplest level of weakly interacting gapped systems, the system is characterised by a single particle gap. Models in this category have for example been proposed for BCS superconductors [12] and for weakly interacting insulators [13,14]. Examples of such behaviour are experimentally observed in unconventional superconductors [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Field-induced Metallic Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these scenarios have included oscillations by excitonic states [35,36] or a Majorana fermion band that breaks gauge symmetry [37,38]. Others have proposed a breakdown of the gap under magnetic field [39,40] or ways for oscillations to occur in gapped systems based on the unhybridized band structure or as an effect of the band edges [41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our surprising finding of quantum oscillations in the magnetic torque of floating zone-grown single crystals of SmB 6 ( Tan et al., 2015 ), despite the bulk insulating gap, has given rise to multiple proposals for their potential origin. Physical mechanisms proposed as potential explanations for the observed quantum oscillations include bulk in-gap low energy excitations ( Tan et al., 2015 ; Hartstein et al., 2018 ), two-dimensional surface conduction states ( Li et al., 2014 ), tunneling across the bulk insulating gap ( Knolle and Cooper, 2015 , 2017 ), and impurity inclusions ( Thomas et al., 2019 ; Fuhrman et al., 2018 ; Fuhrman and Nikolić, 2020 ), among others ( Baskaran, 2015 ; Knolle and Cooper, 2015 , 2017 ; Erten et al., 2016 , 2017 ; Chowdhury et al., 2018 ; Sodemann et al., 2018 ; Thomson and Sachdev, 2016 ; Skinner, 2019 ; Peters et al., 2019 ; Liu and Balents, 2017 ; Shen and Fu, 2018 ; Valentine et al., 2016 ; Harrison, 2018 ; Zhang et al., 2016 ; Pal, 2017 ; Riseborough and Fisk, 2017 ; Grubinskas and Fritz, 2018 ; Sakhya and Maiti, 2020 ; Pixley et al., 2018 ; Ram and Kumar, 2017 ; Anderson, 1992 ; Coleman et al., 1993 ; Motrunich, 2006 ; Grover et al., 2010 ; Paul et al., 2007 ; Kishigi and Hasegawa, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%