1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(97)00131-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical factors in assessing risk from exposure to nasal carcinogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the relative proportions of the nasal cavity occupied by respiratory and olfactory mucosa is very different in rodents vs. humans. Respiratory and olfactory mucosa each occupy approximately 50% of the surface of the rat nasal cavity, while in the human nose, <10% of the surface is covered by olfactory mucosa, with respiratory mucosa covering the remainder (24)(25)(26). There may also be differences in the metabolic enzyme content between rodent and human nasal tissues; however it is known that both rats and humans express the pi form of glutathione S-transferase (27).…”
Section: Hplc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the relative proportions of the nasal cavity occupied by respiratory and olfactory mucosa is very different in rodents vs. humans. Respiratory and olfactory mucosa each occupy approximately 50% of the surface of the rat nasal cavity, while in the human nose, <10% of the surface is covered by olfactory mucosa, with respiratory mucosa covering the remainder (24)(25)(26). There may also be differences in the metabolic enzyme content between rodent and human nasal tissues; however it is known that both rats and humans express the pi form of glutathione S-transferase (27).…”
Section: Hplc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up through 1997, excellent reviews of xenobiotic effects in rodent nasal mucosa (NM) were provided by several investigators (Dahl and Hadley, 1991; Brittebo, 1997; Monticello and Morgan, 1997; Schuller, 1997). The need for an understanding of carcinogenic susceptibility factors in rodent and human nasal tissues in order to develop plausible modes of action has been highlighted (Bogdanffy et al, 1997). The purpose of this review is to expand on these earlier reports with new information on this topic directed to evaluation of human risk from systemic exposure to rodent nasal cytotoxins and carcinogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the first site of contact of the respiratory tract with the environment, it is a common site for absorption of many gases and vapors and for particle deposition-a prime site for toxicant-induced pathology (14,15). Human nasal neoplasms may be related to exposure to environmental factors, including tobacco smoke, dust, metals, aldehydes, chemicals, and viruses (16,17). Oxidative DNA damage is generally regarded as a significant contributory cause of cancer for some environmental pollutants (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%