2002
DOI: 10.1299/jsmepes.2002.8.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Heat Flux in Tight Lattice Core of Reduced-Moderation Water Reactor (RMWR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereby, the local heat flux is considered being an important parameter in developing BT correlation, especially for axial non-uniform heated condition (For axial uniform heated condition, local heat flux is actually can be substituted by critical power, with only a coefficient needed in the substitution). Actually, although Arai correlation can give a good prediction in the present research for the data in the range 350 < G < 500 kg/m 2 s near P ex = 7.2 MPa, this success is considered being quite a coincidence, because the correlation under-predicts the data that are in the same range under axial uniform heated condition (5) . With using the thought of Arai correlation and developing correlation by doing revision to Arai correlation, we find it is very difficult to develop a new correlation that can give good predictions to both JAERI axial uniform and non-uniform heated data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thereby, the local heat flux is considered being an important parameter in developing BT correlation, especially for axial non-uniform heated condition (For axial uniform heated condition, local heat flux is actually can be substituted by critical power, with only a coefficient needed in the substitution). Actually, although Arai correlation can give a good prediction in the present research for the data in the range 350 < G < 500 kg/m 2 s near P ex = 7.2 MPa, this success is considered being quite a coincidence, because the correlation under-predicts the data that are in the same range under axial uniform heated condition (5) . With using the thought of Arai correlation and developing correlation by doing revision to Arai correlation, we find it is very difficult to develop a new correlation that can give good predictions to both JAERI axial uniform and non-uniform heated data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…F r is radial peaking factor. Arai correlation has been reported a not-satisfied prediction accuracy to the critical power data carried in JAERI under axial uniform heated condition (5) . In following, we'll verify the Arai correlation for the data taken for the present axial non-uniform heated condition.…”
Section: Verification Of the Arai Correlationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thereby, critical power experiments in tight-lattice rod bundles, for both axially uniform-heated and double-humpedheated condition, have been carried out at JAERI using 7-rod and 37-rod bundles over a relatively extensive flow condition. [3][4][5] Figure 3 shows the cross-sectional views of the JAERI 7-rod (for both axially uniform-heated and doublehumped-heated test sections) and 37-rod test sections. The descriptions to the 3 test sets are described in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, boiling transition (BT) prediction performance of the subchannel analysis code COBRA-TF improved by JAERI 7) was assessed for the series of tight-lattice CHF experiments performed in JAERI 5,8) . 5,8) CHF experiments for the tight-lattice rod bundles have been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, boiling transition (BT) prediction performance of the subchannel analysis code COBRA-TF improved by JAERI 7) was assessed for the series of tight-lattice CHF experiments performed in JAERI 5,8) . 5,8) CHF experiments for the tight-lattice rod bundles have been conducted. The aims of the experiments are (1) to make clear the parameter effects on critical power, (2) to evaluate the existing design correlation, (3) to develop the high accuracy correlation and (4) to verify the detailed numerical analysis code.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%