New Philosophies of Social Science 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-18946-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Hermeneutics, Realism and the Sociological Tradition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the level of human systems, all systems are open and further complexities need to be added. We have the operation of the 'double hermeneutic', that is, not only do we have to interpret the results of our observations, but our research subjects produce their own readings of the world (Outhwaite, 1987).…”
Section: Deleted: Essayed Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of human systems, all systems are open and further complexities need to be added. We have the operation of the 'double hermeneutic', that is, not only do we have to interpret the results of our observations, but our research subjects produce their own readings of the world (Outhwaite, 1987).…”
Section: Deleted: Essayed Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar views upholding a stratified conception of reality have been voiced by the realist research programme, which originated in the philosophy of science and has lately been extended from natural to social sciences (Bhaskar 1979;Outhwaite 1987;Sayer 1992). …”
Section: A Qualified Defence Of Functional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Hence, social institutions, made objects, and even nature, are independent in the relevant sense for realism, while in other senses dependent on 'us'. [My analysis here follows (without being directly attributable to) Harreá nd Madden, 1975;Newton-Smith, 1981;Lovibond, 1983;Outhwaite, 1987;Putnam, 1987;Searle, 1995; see also Scanlon, 2009. ] Debates about realism are often couched in global or universal terms, where what is at issue is the philosophical validity of understandings of reality itselfthe point is to vindicate or condemn the philosophical coherence of the category reality, or the predicate real.…”
Section: Philosophical Realismmentioning
confidence: 85%