2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical indicators of sustainability for biofuels: An analysis through a life cycle sustainabilty assessment perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
23
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In LCA, the system boundary definition profoundly impacts the materials, processes and emissions considered for evaluation. As such, system boundary limits can also considerably influence the calculation of environmental impacts (Collotta et al 2019). The two commonly studied kinds of system boundary for hydrogen production are 'cradle-to-gate' or 'well-to-pump' that includes processes only until production and 'cradle-to-grave' or 'well-to-wheel', which incorporates emissions during end use as well.…”
Section: System Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In LCA, the system boundary definition profoundly impacts the materials, processes and emissions considered for evaluation. As such, system boundary limits can also considerably influence the calculation of environmental impacts (Collotta et al 2019). The two commonly studied kinds of system boundary for hydrogen production are 'cradle-to-gate' or 'well-to-pump' that includes processes only until production and 'cradle-to-grave' or 'well-to-wheel', which incorporates emissions during end use as well.…”
Section: System Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allowed an intensive testing of the survey. The process experts [20] Finland Henke and Theuvsen 2013 [68] G e r m a n y Manik et al 2013 [69] Indonesia Ekener-Petersen et al 2014 [70] Brazil, USA, France, Lithuania Weldegiorgis and Franks 2014 [71] A u s t r a l i a Pashaei Kamali et al 2014 [72] Latin America, European Union Dewulf et al 2015 [73] -Dos Santos and Brandi 2015 [74] Argentina, Brazil, China, USA, France Ren et al 2015 [75] C h i n a Sanchez Ramirez et al 2016 [76] B r a z i l Ekener et al 2016 [25] G e n e r a l Contreras-Lisperguer et al 2018 [77] Jamaica Sajid and Lynch 2018 [78] Canada Rafiaani et al 2018 [33] G e n e r a l Martin et al 2018 [16] S w e d e n Souza et al 2018 [79] B r a z i l Collotta et al 2019 [80] G e n e r a l Type of product/field of application: bio-based products Agyekum et al 2017 [81] G h a n a Falcone and Imbert 2018 [32] G e n e r a l Spierling et al 2018 [5] G e n e r a l Blanc et al 2019 [82] G e n e r a l Prasara-A et al 2019 [18] Thailand…”
Section: Proposed Methodology For Indicator Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of only four crops in North America, and the only oilseed, that has received the Round Table of Sustainable Materials (RSB) certification (RSB, 2018) for sustainable oil and meal and a low ILUC risk certification in South America. The RSB has developed one of the most robust sustainable frameworks for biofuels (Collotta et al, 2019). This differentiates carinata from other feedstock as it is certified as a low‐carbon feedstock for fuel and non‐GMO high protein meal.…”
Section: Carinata To Address the Demand For A Low‐carbon Bioeconomymentioning
confidence: 99%