Critical Infrastructure Protection

Tabansky, Lior

doi:10.4018/ijcwt.2013070106

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Computerized components are part of the government's critical infrastructure and are prone to hackers and become the target of cyberattacks. Minor disruption to the system's performance can lead to significant economic losses (Kovacevic & Nikolic, 2015;Tabansky, 2011). For businesses, intellectual property theft as well as security and data breaches are common threats the companies need to address.…”

Section: Cybersecurity Protection In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Cybersecurity Protection in Indonesia

Anjani¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use:Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes.You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an OpenContent Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.

show abstract

Section: Cybersecurity Protection In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Cybersecurity Protection in Indonesia

Anjani¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Israel, the Security in Public Bodies Law of 1998 gave public bodies increased authority of supervision. Remarkably, the regulation of public bodies includes over a dozen of public and civilian organisations as well as firms (Tabansky 2013). Acknowledging these entanglements, we can understand public demand for security and economic logics as constitutive for each other within the digital sphere.…”

Section: The Co-production Of Security For Digital Infrastructuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Between Public and Private: The Co-production of Infrastructural Security

Nolte

Westermeier

2020

Politikon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper proposes to use the concept of co-production to account for the mutual coproduction of private as well as public security actors and critical infrastructure. Through an exploration in the field of urban security provision, we aim to contribute to critical security studies by turning to the entanglements of public and private security actors in the process of securitising infrastructure. As the construction and provision of infrastructural security depends neither solely on public nor private actors but on their interaction, we propose the concept of co-production to account for these dynamics. Based on a focused ethnography, the paper mobilises material collected during a security conference in Israel, in which the close connections between private and public security actors were forged and where infrastructure was at the heart of the security concerns.

show abstract

“…The interconnectedness and complexity of securities markets makes it difficult to pinpoint all the relationships between infrastructures and thus always project how an attack or failure of one component (due to cyber or physical incidents) will affect others. 65 Possible negative impacts on market integrity and efficiency could be achieved through, for example:…”

Section:  Factor 4 and 5: Effect On Market Integrity And Efficiency; Imentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber-Crime, Securities Markets, and Systemic Risk

Goyal¹

2013

CFA Digest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

About this Document The IOSCO Research Department produces research and analysis around IOSCO Principle's 6 (on systemic risk) and 7 (reviewing the perimeter of regulation). To support these efforts, the IOSCO Research Department undertakes a number of annual information mining exercises including extensive market intelligence in financial centres; risk roundtables with prominent members of industry and regulators; data gathering and analysis; the construction of quantitative risk indicators; a survey on emerging risks to regulators, academics and market participants; and review of the current literature on risks by experts. This holistic approach to risk identification is important in capturing those potential risks that may not be apparent in the available data (i.e. not necessarily quantifiable), or which may be currently seen as outside the perimeter of securities market regulation-but nonetheless relevant. One potential risk that has been strongly and consistently highlighted during recent risk identification activities (and in the 2012 IOSCO Securities Market Risk Outlook) is cyber-crime, especially as it relates to financial market infrastructures. As a first step towards engaging with this issue, the IOSCO Research Department, jointly with the World Federation of Exchanges, conducted a cyber-crime survey of the world's exchanges. This IOSCO Staff Working Paper Cyber-crime, Securities Market and Systemic Risk presents the results of this survey, as well as key insights on the current cyber-threat landscape and potential systemic risk aspects. This report and survey is intended as part of a series exploring perspectives and experiences with cyber-crime across different groups of securities market actors. The purpose of the series is predominantly to: (1) deepen understanding around the extent of the cyber-crime threat in securities markets; (2) highlight potential systemic risk concerns that could be considered by securities market regulators and market participants; and (3) capture and synthesize into one document some of the key issues in terms of cyber-crime and securities markets in order to increase general understanding and awareness.

show abstract

Critical Infrastructure Protection

Cited by 10 publications

References 1 publication

Cybersecurity Protection in Indonesia

Cybersecurity Protection in Indonesia

Between Public and Private: The Co-production of Infrastructural Security

Cyber-Crime, Securities Markets, and Systemic Risk

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About