Critical Language Awareness: A beckoning frontier in social work education?

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Effective social work practice is predicated on empowering, inclusive and culturally responsive communication, and yet, there appears to be very limited focus on language awareness, let alone critical language awareness, in contemporary social work education—both within and beyond the Australasia context. This gap is more worrying against a background where neoliberal and instrumental discourses (Habermas, 1969; O’Regan, 2001) have freely proliferated, and now threaten to colonise virtually all areas of private and public life (Chouliaraki Fairclough, 1999). In response, this article advocates the inclusion of Critical Language Awareness (CLA) in contemporary social work education.APPROACH: This article initially maps the broad scope and historical emergence of CLA, before surveying its key political and theoretical influences.FINDINGS: The key outcome is that CLA—as delineated—clearly shares significant overlaps with social work co-values, particularly: justice, equality and a commitment to anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice (Dominelli, 2002; Payne, 1997). More importantly, CLA provides conceptual and analytical resources that promise to significantly sharpen students’ abilities to recognise, question and ultimately challenge, oppressive discourses (Fairclough, 2011; Manjarres, 2011; Wodak, 2006).CONCLUSION: It is recommended that CLA strands be woven into existing social work themes and topics. The final part of the article offers some practical suggestions on how this could be done.

Who are the service users? Language, neo-liberalism and social constructions

“…Keywords such as 'patient', 'client', 'customer', 'expert by experience' and 'service user' are integral to social work's discourses. Looking beneath the surface of these key terms offers us the opportunity to 'cultivate new habits of disruptive thinking' (Fritsch et al, 2016, p. 116), interrogating discourses that are often insufficiently questioned within mainstream social work (Chihota, 2017). Beckett (2003, p. 627) rightly warns us against 'naivete about the extent to which changing the names of things (using anti-oppressive language for example) can change the world itself'.…”

The state of eco-social work training in Canada: Transformative praxis for climate constrained futures

“…Teaching radical social work requires a commitment to critical reflective practice (Morley and Macfarlane, 2014) that considers the (meta-)narratives, discourses and discursive strategies of language employed to construct and reify power relations (Fraser et al, 2017). For instance, as Chihota (2017: 59) points out, ‘inviting a client for “a chat” raises very different expectations than asking them to attend “an interview” or “assessment”’. Regrettably, neoliberalization has infiltrated social work practice and education, implanting a fatalistic resignation to a dystopian future, and stifling the imaginative scope to envisage and work towards alternatives.…”