2021
DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2021.1923353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Latin American agroecology as a regionalism from below

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Informed by Latin American Critical Thought, social movements have elaborated a decolonial perspective on territorial development, inverting its colonial and neocolonial origins. Those movements have sought to extend EcoSol-agroecology networks, potentially towards regionalism from below [22]. Moreover, they have recast hegemonic concepts for counter-hegemonic meanings and practices, as outlined in the literature review and illustrated by our three case studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Informed by Latin American Critical Thought, social movements have elaborated a decolonial perspective on territorial development, inverting its colonial and neocolonial origins. Those movements have sought to extend EcoSol-agroecology networks, potentially towards regionalism from below [22]. Moreover, they have recast hegemonic concepts for counter-hegemonic meanings and practices, as outlined in the literature review and illustrated by our three case studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such networks have been most politically charged and popularly organised in Latin America, resulting from joint efforts by rural movements, intellectuals, and agronomists. Together they have promoted a regional integration, even a regionalism from below, by territorialising nearby agroecological initiatives [22]. Their strategies have been informed by a broader Latin American Critical Thought, which critically analyses the Eurocentric neocolonial roles of hegemonic concepts, e.g., modernity, modernisation, technology, territorial development, nature protection, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an increasingly interconnected globe, transnational networks and cross-border civil society engagement have gained salience as conduits for regional integration and become particularly critical for instances when politics or ideological orientation make governments refrain from playing that role (Igarashi 2018;Titifanue et al 2020). We thus have the emergence of "regionalism from below" (Rosset et al 2021) related to such a bottom-up process of building regionalisms based on social movements acting and thinking locally. These movements weave connections to grassroots experiences and bring local knowledge elements.…”
Section: Csos Under Governance Through Goals: a Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the limitations of this type of connection should be better analyzed in order to determine its real contribution to territorial strengthening processes [28]. Moreover, in times of conservative offensives, especially in Latin America, instruments for strengthening collective subjects are essential to maintaining and reinventing processes of peasant resistance [60][61][62][63], also facing ecological trends and sociopolitical processes linked to climate change [64].…”
Section: Peasant Poetry Popular Education and Agroecologymentioning
confidence: 99%