2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical pitting and repassivation temperatures for duplex stainless steel in chloride solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
63
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(12 reference statements)
10
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Influence of Mo addition on pit nucletion in the duplex structure Figure 5A and B show the pits formed on the etched surface of DIN 1.4362 and DIN 1.4462 after polarization experiments in pH 10 solution, respectively. This kind of pit was more occluded with a dimension of ≈ 2µm, which is consistent with the results found by (Deng et al, 2008). For the Free Mo duplex SS (Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Mo Adition On Pitting Potential Of Stainless Stsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Influence of Mo addition on pit nucletion in the duplex structure Figure 5A and B show the pits formed on the etched surface of DIN 1.4362 and DIN 1.4462 after polarization experiments in pH 10 solution, respectively. This kind of pit was more occluded with a dimension of ≈ 2µm, which is consistent with the results found by (Deng et al, 2008). For the Free Mo duplex SS (Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Mo Adition On Pitting Potential Of Stainless Stsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This calculation would suggest a higher susceptibility of austenite, having lower PRE number, to initiate pitting corrosion than the ferrite phase at temperature above the CPT. The preferential pitting corrosion attack of the austenite phase at temperatures above the CPT has already been observed in other studies [32][33][34][35][36]. The lower amount of Cr and Mo in the austenite phase could be a reason of its higher susceptibility to pitting corrosion compared to the ferrite phase.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperature On the Corrosion Behavior Of 2205 Dssmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These results suggest that long period heat treatments decrease the passive Cr 2 O 3 layer formation capacity, since the chromium available for the passive layer formation precipitates in the form of Cr 23 C 6 , demonstrating that inappropriate heat treatment and/or aging time compromise the resistance to corrosion of this steel, mainly when the environment is rich in chlorides. This significative E c reduction, as steel heat treatment time increases occurs, first of all, due to the formation of the M 23 C 6 type carbide precipitates, which potentialize the corrosive attack on grain boundaries, as observed on the works of Ghosh et al [7] and Deng et al [18]. A preponderant factor which occurs on AISI 304 steel, when compared to AISI 316 steel, is the fact that AISI 304 steel does not present any molybdenum in its composition, different from AISI 316 steel, which has about 3-5 wt% molybdenum in its composition.…”
Section: Potentiodynamic Polarization In Nacl 35 Wt%mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…7, it can be noticed on the potential range close to +0.20 V that the sample as received has a slightly increasing of its current density. According to Deng et al [18], these are current transients, during the formation of metastable character pitting, where these metastable pitting are nothing more than the beginning of pitting formation on defective regions of the surface, having its origin on the adsorption of the electrolyte on steel surface.…”
Section: Potentiodynamic Polarization In Nacl 35 Wt%mentioning
confidence: 99%