2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-018-01352-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Point Theory for the Lorentz Force Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial motivation comes from the fact that the relativistic mean curvature operator is an essential object in Geometry and Physics. More precisely, M appears naturally in the Riemannian Geometry-where it is involved in the determination of the maximal or constant mean curvature hypersurfaces in the Lorentz-Minkowski space (see, e.g., Cheng & Yau [8], Flaherty [16], Bartnik & Simon [2], Kiessling [18], Corsato et al [10])-and in classical relativity-for instance in the analysis of the forced relativistic pendulum (see, e.g., Brezis & Mawhin [7]), in the study of the Born-Infeld theory of electrodynamics (see, e.g., Bonheure et al [5,6]) or in some investigations related with the Lorentz force equation (see, e.g., Arcoya et al [1]).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problem And Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial motivation comes from the fact that the relativistic mean curvature operator is an essential object in Geometry and Physics. More precisely, M appears naturally in the Riemannian Geometry-where it is involved in the determination of the maximal or constant mean curvature hypersurfaces in the Lorentz-Minkowski space (see, e.g., Cheng & Yau [8], Flaherty [16], Bartnik & Simon [2], Kiessling [18], Corsato et al [10])-and in classical relativity-for instance in the analysis of the forced relativistic pendulum (see, e.g., Brezis & Mawhin [7]), in the study of the Born-Infeld theory of electrodynamics (see, e.g., Bonheure et al [5,6]) or in some investigations related with the Lorentz force equation (see, e.g., Arcoya et al [1]).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problem And Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second difficulty comes from the non-differentiability of the kinetic part of the relativistic Keplerian lagrangian, K( ẋ) = −mc 2 (1 − | ẋ| 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 , making the functional I not smooth on any natural space of functions and the usual critical point theory not directly applicable. To overcome these difficulties, we borrow some results from the recent paper [4], where a variational formulation is provided for the Lorentz force equation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key point for this variational formulation is the choice of the Sobolev space W 1,∞ T of Lipschitz continuous and T -periodic functions as the domain for the associated action functional, allowing for the use of Skzulin's version [25] of non-smooth critical point theory. As carefully explained in the introduction of [4], the choice of this functional space is forced by the presence of the term ẋ ∧ B in equation (1.4). However, quite surprisingly, it turns out to be very convenient also when applied to equation (1.3), which corresponds (after normalization of constants) to (1.4) for B ≡ 0 but, on the other hand, presents a singularity in the term E(t, x) = −αx/|x| 3 + ∇ x U (t, x) (the fact that x is two or three-dimensional does not play a role).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the motions induced by a time dependent electromagnetic field have not been studied extensively. Some results have been obtained through variational techniques in relativistic regimes in [2,3], where critical point and Lusternik-Schnirelman theories are developed for periodic and Dirichlet boundary conditions. However, in these works, electromagnetic fields are assumed to be regular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%