2017
DOI: 10.1177/1471301217734478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research

Abstract: Methodological rigour, or its absence, is often a focus of concern for the emerging field of evaluation and research around arts and dementia. However, this paper suggests that critical attention should also be paid to the way in which individual perceptions, hidden assumptions and underlying social and political structures influence methodological work in the field. Such attention will be particularly important for addressing methodological challenges relating to contextual variability, ethics, value judgemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there has been recognition of the need to privilege the perspectives and voices of people living with a dementia and the role of the arts in facilitating this (Beard, 2012;Bartlett, 2014;Hara, 2011;Hughes, 2014;McFadden et al, 2008;Zeilig et al, 2014). Although the evidence base requires further strengthening and is still largely under-theorised (Gray et al, 2017;Schall et al, 2017), it is widely accepted that both the participative arts and art therapy are important in a variety of ways for ameliorating the lives of people with a dementia (Creative Health, APPG, 2017).…”
Section: The Arts For People Living With a Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there has been recognition of the need to privilege the perspectives and voices of people living with a dementia and the role of the arts in facilitating this (Beard, 2012;Bartlett, 2014;Hara, 2011;Hughes, 2014;McFadden et al, 2008;Zeilig et al, 2014). Although the evidence base requires further strengthening and is still largely under-theorised (Gray et al, 2017;Schall et al, 2017), it is widely accepted that both the participative arts and art therapy are important in a variety of ways for ameliorating the lives of people with a dementia (Creative Health, APPG, 2017).…”
Section: The Arts For People Living With a Dementiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there is ample innovation and proof-of-principle evidence to make the arts a fertile field for dementia researchers in pursuit of evidence. Meta-reviews of psychosocial interventions are beginning to place arts interventions on a par with other non-pharmacological approaches to alleviate certain behavioural symptoms of dementia, such as agitation and apathy [ 55 , 56 ]. One of the broadest systematic reviews of the arts in dementia, cited earlier in this paper [ 8 ], summarises the characteristics of the included studies, and this gives an overview of the contemporary research field ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussion: a Rationale For The Arts In Dementia Care Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, arts and dementia research lacks appropriate theoretical frameworks (Young, Camic and Tischler, 2016), and few studies have attempted to explain how the arts 'work' for people with dementia (Windle et al, 2017). Furthermore, the field has no common language to name and communicate the mechanisms and outcomes of arts interventions between multi-disciplinary partnersfor example artists, care staff, researchers, funders and people living with dementia (Gray et al, 2017). In summary, the description, explanation, communication and simplification of arts interventions for people with dementia needs improving.…”
Section: A Taxonomy Of Arts Interventions For People With Dementia: Amentioning
confidence: 99%