2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2006)10:3(183)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Review of Deflection Formulas for FRP-RC Members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, for a moment ratio of 3 ( Figure 2) and also for 5 (not depicted), 92% of the beams show a deflection ratio between 0.6 and 1.7, giving less scattered results. In order to study the goodness of fit of the different theoretical expressions, the deflection ratio is statistically analyzed (Mota et al 2006) depending on the parameter n , being n the modular ratio and the reinforcement ratio (Figures 3a, b). In order to study the goodness of fit of the different theoretical expressions, the deflection ratio is statistically analyzed (Mota et al 2006) depending on the parameter n , being n the modular ratio and the reinforcement ratio (Figures 3a, b).…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for a moment ratio of 3 ( Figure 2) and also for 5 (not depicted), 92% of the beams show a deflection ratio between 0.6 and 1.7, giving less scattered results. In order to study the goodness of fit of the different theoretical expressions, the deflection ratio is statistically analyzed (Mota et al 2006) depending on the parameter n , being n the modular ratio and the reinforcement ratio (Figures 3a, b). In order to study the goodness of fit of the different theoretical expressions, the deflection ratio is statistically analyzed (Mota et al 2006) depending on the parameter n , being n the modular ratio and the reinforcement ratio (Figures 3a, b).…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that these equations which are adopted in ACI 440.1R-06 guidelines were developed based on limited data of some kind of FRP bars, such as GFRP and CFRP. Many researchers have pointed out that these equations have deviation on the calculation of the FRP reinforced concrete beams' deflection [9,14,16]. The numerical and analytical models have a better precision to predict the deformability of the FRP-RC beams because many factors such as crack, concrete damage and bond-slip between concrete and FRP bars were included.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deflection, a number of studies [6][7][8] Branson"s original equation 9 for the effective moment of inertia and introduced modification factors for FRP-RC members. Other studies [10][11][12] proposed an equivalent moment of inertia derived from curvatures. For cracking, modifications were proposed to the original Gergely and Lutz 13 equation or strain limits were introduced to control the crack width.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%