1993
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90963-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical review of the approaches to the prevention of sudden death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results of trials of antiarrhythmic drugs have mostly been adverse: 4,5,19,20 antiarrhythmic drug therapy was associated with increased deaths, in most cases sudden and presumably arrhythmic, that were attributed to a proarrhythmic effect. Yusuf and colleagues' meta-analysis 21 of trials of antiarrhythmic drugs after myocardial infarction showed that sodium-channel blockers were harmful and that calcium-channel antagonists had no beneficial effects; by contrast, a favourable effect was observed with the use of amiodarone in a small population. Similarly, Teo and colleagues' meta-analysis 22 of placebo-controlled trials of amiodarone after myocardial infarction or in patients with heart failure suggested that survival substantially improved with the use of amiodarone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of trials of antiarrhythmic drugs have mostly been adverse: 4,5,19,20 antiarrhythmic drug therapy was associated with increased deaths, in most cases sudden and presumably arrhythmic, that were attributed to a proarrhythmic effect. Yusuf and colleagues' meta-analysis 21 of trials of antiarrhythmic drugs after myocardial infarction showed that sodium-channel blockers were harmful and that calcium-channel antagonists had no beneficial effects; by contrast, a favourable effect was observed with the use of amiodarone in a small population. Similarly, Teo and colleagues' meta-analysis 22 of placebo-controlled trials of amiodarone after myocardial infarction or in patients with heart failure suggested that survival substantially improved with the use of amiodarone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCD occurs in approximately 75,000-100,000 people annually in the UK and represents the largest proportion of the deaths attributable to coronary heart disease 4,5 (Table 1). Approximately 85-90% of SCD is due to a first arrhythmic event, the remaining 10-15% being due to recurrent events.…”
Section: Description Of Underlying Health Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circadian patterns in the occurrence of .sudden arrhythmic death and ventricular arrhythmias are consistent with the potential role of increased sympathetic activity (2)(3)(4)(5). Data have steadily accumulated that indicate that attenuation and blockade of adrenergic drive lowers the propensity for sudden death in varying subsets of patients with cardiac disease (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). This finding is particularly striking in the case of (3-adrenergic-blocking drugs, which have now been shown to decrease mortality in the survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI) (6,9,10) and cardiac arrest (8) as well as in subsets of patients with congestive cardiac failure (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Data have steadily accumulated that indicate that attenuation and blockade of adrenergic drive lowers the propensity for sudden death in varying subsets of patients with cardiac disease (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). This finding is particularly striking in the case of (3-adrenergic-blocking drugs, which have now been shown to decrease mortality in the survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI) (6,9,10) and cardiac arrest (8) as well as in subsets of patients with congestive cardiac failure (12). Decreased heart rate (HR) variability, seen in patient groups including those after MI and survivors of sudden cardiac death in whom sympathetic activity is increased, is an independent predictor of increased mortality (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%