2008
DOI: 10.1128/jb.01642-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Role of a Single Position in the −35 Element for Promoter Recognition by Mycobacterium tuberculosis SigE and SigH

Abstract: Mycobacterial SigE and SigH both initiate transcription from the sigB promoter, suggesting that they recognize similar sequences. Through mutational and primer extension analyses, we determined that SigE and SigH recognize nearly identical promoters, with differences at the 3′ end of the −35 element distinguishing between SigE- and SigH-dependent promoters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4), it is unlikely that P1 is recognized by E in vivo. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that the P1 promoter sequence is distant (even if somewhat related because of degenerate bases) from the reported E consensus promoter (32) and by the observation that the SDS-mediated induction of sigE is maintained in a sigE mutant strain (22). Since ECF sigma factors usually recognize similar promoters, it is possible that P1 is indeed recognized in vivo by an ECF sigma factor that is different from E , which could be able to recognize it under less-stringent in vitro conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…4), it is unlikely that P1 is recognized by E in vivo. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that the P1 promoter sequence is distant (even if somewhat related because of degenerate bases) from the reported E consensus promoter (32) and by the observation that the SDS-mediated induction of sigE is maintained in a sigE mutant strain (22). Since ECF sigma factors usually recognize similar promoters, it is possible that P1 is indeed recognized in vivo by an ECF sigma factor that is different from E , which could be able to recognize it under less-stringent in vitro conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The corresponding band was not detected in comparable samples obtained from the ⌬-H mutant. It has previously been reported that the expression of Rv2745c is controlled by E (14,51). The inability of the ⌬-H mutant to induce the expression of E likely results in the lack of induction of the Rv2745c gene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A potential candidate was sigB, since sigB contains a sigE-dependent promoter (17,32) and because sigB levels are decreased in a sigE mutant during logarithmic growth, SDS-mediated stress (17), and hypoxia (Fig. 2D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figure shows the regulatory interactions revealed in the present work. The sigE-sigB interaction is taken from the literature (17,32). The colors of the ovals containing the gene names represent gene classes in the network structure as follows: black, global regulators; gray, local regulators; white, effector genes.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%