2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0465-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical role of intermediate electronic states for spin-flip processes in charge-transfer-type organic molecules with multiple donors and acceptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
298
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
15
298
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantities used for the best fits are shown in Table . The determined Δ E a value for 4CzIPN is almost the same as one reported by Noda et al, who determined Δ E a from the k ISC values in the temperature range from 250 to 300 K. Theoretically, it is expected that the direct ISC between S 1 and T n takes place with a slow and temperature‐independent rate in 4CzIPN . Therefore, the observed temperature dependence is ascribed to T n .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantities used for the best fits are shown in Table . The determined Δ E a value for 4CzIPN is almost the same as one reported by Noda et al, who determined Δ E a from the k ISC values in the temperature range from 250 to 300 K. Theoretically, it is expected that the direct ISC between S 1 and T n takes place with a slow and temperature‐independent rate in 4CzIPN . Therefore, the observed temperature dependence is ascribed to T n .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In flavin in aqueous solution, for example, the ISC between S 1 and T 2 seems to be forbidden according to the El‐Sayed rule but it efficiently proceeds via the intersection at a rate of k ISC = 10 8 s −1 . Noda et al have proposed that the (reverse) ISC in 4CzIPN is accelerated when the temperature is high enough for excitons to surmount the potential barrier that is formed by the potential surfaces of S 1 and T n In such a case, the determined activation energy of k ISC corresponds to the height of the potential barrier measured from the potential minimum of S 1 . In Figure , we show two possible potential energy surfaces with large and small geometrical differences between the potential minima of S 1 and T n .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, remarkably strong SOC can be expected when the spin-flip processes arise between the CT and energetically close-lying locally excited (LE) states with different spin multiplicities owing to the orbital angular momentum change between the two states 27,39 . Several groups have reported that k RISC is accelerated by the strong SOC matrix element between the 1 CT (S 1 ) and 3 LE (T 2 ) states, caused by non-adiabatic vibronic coupling (Ĥ VC ) between the 3 CT (T 1 ) and 3 LE (T 2 ) states [40][41][42] . In this study, we demonstrate that a small modulation in excited states of an aromatic organic molecule, mediated by SOC between 1 CT and 3 LE states, greatly affects the rate constants of a TADF molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been widely demonstrated that a small singlet–triplet energy difference (Δ E ST ) is the necessary condition to harvest nonradiative triplets into radiative singlets, providing the basic information on energy parameter effects. On the other hand, spin–orbital coupling (SOC) has been considered as the key mechanism to flip the spins of triplets, enabling the triplet‐to‐singlet conversion toward developing delayed fluorescence . However, the polarization parameter has been reminded as an unaddressed issue to be related to spin and energy parameters (SOC and Δ E ST ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%