2021
DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2021.1960559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical SFL praxis in teacher education: Looking backward and looking forward (Introduction to special issue on Systemic Functional Linguistics as Critical Praxis in Teacher Education: Looking Backward and Looking Forward)

Abstract: This special issue explores the affordances and limitations of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as a critical social praxis, specifically within the context of teacher education. We define Critical SFL Praxis (CSFLP) as a social activist approach to teacher education that develops teachers' ability to enact language use in literacy instruction to support learners in seeing, using, and challenging the nature of text/context relationships within and outside institutions through SFL. In this way, CSFLP focus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction of these ideational, interpersonal, and textual metafunctions highlights how EFL textbooks approach language learning with a pedagogically informed approach. The robustness of these findings is strengthened by matching findings with previous research, highlighting similar patterns across various educational settings (Troyan et al, 2022). These linguistic characteristics help learners build their language skills while improving their communicative competence and scaffolding their engagement with knowledge.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The interaction of these ideational, interpersonal, and textual metafunctions highlights how EFL textbooks approach language learning with a pedagogically informed approach. The robustness of these findings is strengthened by matching findings with previous research, highlighting similar patterns across various educational settings (Troyan et al, 2022). These linguistic characteristics help learners build their language skills while improving their communicative competence and scaffolding their engagement with knowledge.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this case, there should be an agreement toward the consensus saying that Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) has the potential to manage discourse moves and commodity exchanges in EFL classrooms. These results provide convincing evidence that the incorporation of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) concepts into EFL instruction allows teachers to encourage more effective discourse strategies, learning resources, social proposes enabling richer and more involved interactions between teacher and students and among students themselves [71]. In order to help teachers and students achieve stronger communication and language proficiency, the significance of incorporating Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) into language teaching is essential.…”
Section: Systemic Functional Linguistics (Sfl) and Classroom Interactionmentioning
confidence: 85%