2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2012.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Skills and Procedures in Emergency Medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the umbilical vein can be used as a substitute in infants. The umbilical vein is an accessible vein with sufficient diameter and easy access to central arteries, which make it an appropriate alternative in terms of time and risk (2). Its biggest limitation is time because umbilical vein can be closed and unusable one week after birth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the umbilical vein can be used as a substitute in infants. The umbilical vein is an accessible vein with sufficient diameter and easy access to central arteries, which make it an appropriate alternative in terms of time and risk (2). Its biggest limitation is time because umbilical vein can be closed and unusable one week after birth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In the 1980s, a resurgence in IO use occurred primarily for pediatric resuscitation. With the introduction of plastic intravenous (IV) catheters in the 1950s, IO access fell into disfavor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately one billion vascular access procedures are performed annually in the United States (and approximately four billion procedures worldwide) 13 . We focused on cannulation of upper-extremity peripheral vessels, which are the most common targets for cannulation (>95% of total procedures 8 ) and considered particularly challenging due to their small size (typically 2 to 3 mm in adults and <1 mm in children) and tendency to roll or collapse 44 . In our studies, autonomous robotic cannulation reduced the mean number of failed access attempts by sixfold (1.8 per trial to 0.3 per trial) and increased first-stick success rates from 53% to 88% compared to blind manual access, with the largest gains seen in the most difficult physiological conditions (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%