1999
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-36-5-876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical state strength parameters of saturated clays from the modified Cam clay model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional constitutive models for clays, such as two versions of the Cam‐clay models that were developed based on critical state theory, assume that the yield surfaces are symmetrical with respect to hydrostatic axis p in the p ‐ q plane. These traditional models or their variants can simulate the correct trends for isotropically consolidated clays and have achieved wide success in the last several decades . However, these isotropic models have been less successful in simulating the behaviors of soils subjected to either the k 0 condition or anisotropic consolidation history because the initial yield surfaces are aligned along the p axis and only isotropic hardening is considered during shearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional constitutive models for clays, such as two versions of the Cam‐clay models that were developed based on critical state theory, assume that the yield surfaces are symmetrical with respect to hydrostatic axis p in the p ‐ q plane. These traditional models or their variants can simulate the correct trends for isotropically consolidated clays and have achieved wide success in the last several decades . However, these isotropic models have been less successful in simulating the behaviors of soils subjected to either the k 0 condition or anisotropic consolidation history because the initial yield surfaces are aligned along the p axis and only isotropic hardening is considered during shearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because values determined from triaxial tests and thus strictly not applicable to a plane strain problem, a sensitivity run was conducted with lower M values. These reduced M values (0.77 for the SB clay and prism and 1.03 for the trench and LSB turbidites) consider that plane strain ϕ ′ values are approximately 8% greater than those from triaxial tests and that M = √3 sin ϕ ′ for plane strain tests [ Chang et al , 1999].…”
Section: Description Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of shear strain around the cavity of radius a can be obtained by combining Equations (18) and (23), which gives rise to…”
Section: Plastic Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the value of is larger than that of . Detailed discussions on this subject have been reported by Wroth [22], Wood [17] and Chang et al [23]. The friction angle is assumed as 303 in the subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation