2012
DOI: 10.1080/15475778.2012.706704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Systems Thinking: A Creative Approach to Organizational Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paradigms are the superior tier of theoretical hierarchies. They co-evolve with metatheory, comprised of the general theories of social systems, which, most notably for this discussion, include evolutionary and institutional economics ( Edwards, 2014 ; Kogetsidis, 2012 ; Overton, 2007 ). The core concepts and principles of metatheory, and their epistemological influences, are built upon and tested, through the development of hypotheses, by mid-range theories such as GT and systems theories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradigms are the superior tier of theoretical hierarchies. They co-evolve with metatheory, comprised of the general theories of social systems, which, most notably for this discussion, include evolutionary and institutional economics ( Edwards, 2014 ; Kogetsidis, 2012 ; Overton, 2007 ). The core concepts and principles of metatheory, and their epistemological influences, are built upon and tested, through the development of hypotheses, by mid-range theories such as GT and systems theories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the notion of some studies, we assume that organisations are unique systems and thus, the changes are implemented constantly and as the separate projects, are implemented immediately or are continuous. Hence, the scale of changes ranges from the corrections of local departments to a large-scale transformation of organisation (Smith 2011;Kogetsidis 2012).…”
Section: Alphamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not surprising that metatheorizing, whether it appears under that term or in other guises, should have a significant presence in systems research. Systems science has been described as a ‘meta‐discipline’ (Kogetsidis, , p. 185), a ‘transdiscipline’ (Jackson, , p. 133) and as a ‘metascience’ (Flood and Carson, ). There are many varieties of systems theories, systems thinking and systems practice that exhibit metatheoretical and meta‐methodological qualities and which are used to perform metatheoretical research.…”
Section: What Is Metatheorizing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many varieties of systems theories, systems thinking and systems practice that exhibit metatheoretical and meta‐methodological qualities and which are used to perform metatheoretical research. Examples include critical systems theory/practice (CST) (Jackson, ; Kogetsidis, ), evolutionary systems design (Laszlo, ), creative holism (Jackson, ), chaordic systems thinking (van Eijnatten, ; Putnik and van Eijnatten, ) and general systems theory (von Bertalanffy, ; Skyttner, ).…”
Section: What Is Metatheorizing?mentioning
confidence: 99%