1977
DOI: 10.1080/14786437708232982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical test of radiation-damage models by means of dislocation pinning experiments on copper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I n the form in which it is generally used the term displacement threshold energy, Ed, refers to a very special physical situation which under certain conditions may be met at liquid-helium temperatures (THe).Therefore, as discussed in detail in [lo], the threshold energy concept has t o be reconsidered if experimental results are to be interpreted which refer to elevated temperatures. Atom displacement is monitored during irradiation by measuring the change of a n experimental parameter which depends on Frenkel pair production rate, P ( E , 0) = C i a 3 (1)…”
Section: Effective Displacement Threshold Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I n the form in which it is generally used the term displacement threshold energy, Ed, refers to a very special physical situation which under certain conditions may be met at liquid-helium temperatures (THe).Therefore, as discussed in detail in [lo], the threshold energy concept has t o be reconsidered if experimental results are to be interpreted which refer to elevated temperatures. Atom displacement is monitored during irradiation by measuring the change of a n experimental parameter which depends on Frenkel pair production rate, P ( E , 0) = C i a 3 (1)…”
Section: Effective Displacement Threshold Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best value of pFp for free vacancies and free SIA's is 9. 5 x Rcm [19]; $p is probably not much less [25, 261, it will be taken as 9 x 10-4 Qcm. From the measured initial slopes in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured beam current was 3.5 x 10-6A/cm2 in set A and 1. 5 x loW6 A/crn2 in set B. The difference in temperature over a specimen gage length due to beam heating was less than 3 K in set A.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations