2018
DOI: 10.24313/jpbl.2018.5.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Thinking and PBL: What, Why and How?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Woodham et al (2015) observed that students who engaged in video-assisted PBL faced difficulties identifying problems from the presented data, showed a reduced ability to evaluate and resolve clinical problems, and spent more time interpreting clinical scenarios. In contrast, Conway and McMillan (2018) found that video-assisted case delivery improved critical thinking significantly more than did text-assisted case delivery. Although these studies are not directly comparable because of the heterogeneity in study design and lack of specific application guidelines, they do indicate a need for developing evidence-based guidelines for multimedia video-assisted PBL programs to enhance students' ability to recognize relevant data and strengthen critical thinking skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Woodham et al (2015) observed that students who engaged in video-assisted PBL faced difficulties identifying problems from the presented data, showed a reduced ability to evaluate and resolve clinical problems, and spent more time interpreting clinical scenarios. In contrast, Conway and McMillan (2018) found that video-assisted case delivery improved critical thinking significantly more than did text-assisted case delivery. Although these studies are not directly comparable because of the heterogeneity in study design and lack of specific application guidelines, they do indicate a need for developing evidence-based guidelines for multimedia video-assisted PBL programs to enhance students' ability to recognize relevant data and strengthen critical thinking skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%