2018
DOI: 10.21432/cjlt27782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Thinking in Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Systematic Review | La pensée critique dans les discussions asynchrones en ligne : examen systématique

Abstract: Enhancing critical thinking is a common goal of higher education. Designing and facilitating learning environments in which critical thinking may develop is a key responsibility for instructors. In this paper, we seek to inform future research and practice by investigating instructional strategies that could be used to promote critical and reflective thinking in asynchronous online discussions. Our literature review was qualitative and systematic, and focused specifically on strategies that were effective in f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Structured discussions, such as those with clearly defined expectations (e.g., use of rubric, associated grades) or where students are assigned specific roles or placed into groups, tend to have greater levels of student engagement (Aloni & Harrington, 2018;DiPasquale & Hunter, 2018;Ellis, 2008). When educators make deliberate efforts to create a sense of community, attend to diverse learner backgrounds and interests, and participate in discussion activities, discussion post quality and perceived learning on the part of students improves (Aloni & Harrington, 2018;Schindler & Burkholder, 2014).…”
Section: Asynchronous Online Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structured discussions, such as those with clearly defined expectations (e.g., use of rubric, associated grades) or where students are assigned specific roles or placed into groups, tend to have greater levels of student engagement (Aloni & Harrington, 2018;DiPasquale & Hunter, 2018;Ellis, 2008). When educators make deliberate efforts to create a sense of community, attend to diverse learner backgrounds and interests, and participate in discussion activities, discussion post quality and perceived learning on the part of students improves (Aloni & Harrington, 2018;Schindler & Burkholder, 2014).…”
Section: Asynchronous Online Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online protocols have shown promising results, perhaps because they integrate several successful strategies for online discussions (deNoyelles et al, 2014;DiPasquale & Hunter, 2018). To create active participation, protocols assign specific roles to play during the discussion (Hancock & Rowland, 2017;Hou, 2011;Olesova et al, 2016).…”
Section: Protocol Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nas organizações, ela foi tida com um elemento importante na obtenção de resultados econômicos (Procter & Currie, 2004 O pensamento crítico é entendido como a capacidade de saber julgar intencionalmente e ponderar aquilo em que se acredita ou realizar algo em resposta a uma observação, experiência ou argumento. Diversas pesquisas têm analisado o potencial das modalidades híbrida e online para estimular o desenvolvimento de pensamento crítico e os resultados têm sido satisfatórios, indicando que as salas de aula online e híbrida têm suprido ou, em alguns casos, até superado a experiência da sala de aula presencial para desenvolver o pensamento crítico (Rahmi, 2019;Dipasquale, Hunter, 2018). O pensamento crítico está associado à capacidade de resolver problemas, que diz respeito à análise de problemas, tomada de ações eficazes e percepção do efeito ou consequências das decisões.…”
Section: Trabalho Em Equipeunclassified