2006
DOI: 10.21225/d5bs38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Thinking in the Online Nursing Education Setting: Raising the Bar

Abstract: This article explores the effectiveness of writing to help nurse-learners develop critical thinking in an asynchronous, online learning environment. The formal written assignments of students in an online nursing health assessment program were analyzed for evidence of critical thinking according to Johns’ Model of Structured Reflection (Johns, 1995) based on Carper’s Ways of Knowing in Nursing (Carper, 1978), as well as for growth in discipline-specific writing. Informal contributions by participants and the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When distance education technologies are managed well, they provide effective and fast feedback by facilitating the interaction between students and instructors and their peers. This situation enables students to develop their critical thinking skills (Carter et al, 2006).…”
Section: Distance Education Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When distance education technologies are managed well, they provide effective and fast feedback by facilitating the interaction between students and instructors and their peers. This situation enables students to develop their critical thinking skills (Carter et al, 2006).…”
Section: Distance Education Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses with critical thinking skills can respond to their practices more effectively in order to meet the needs of the healthy/sick individual (Carter et al, 2006).…”
Section: Distance Education Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the students in comparison group #2 were not nurses, the framework was deemed to be appropriate for this group given the reflective autobiographical nature of the group's writing assignment. The researcher had used Johns's (1995) framework previously in her work with two research teams from Laurentian's School of Nursing and had been the primary author for two peer-reviewed articles based on Johns's work (Carter et al, 2006;Carter & Rukholm, 2002).…”
Section: Ways Of Thinking In Writing Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%