2021
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2020.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criticism of Bowlby's theory of adaptedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attachment theory is often drawn on in studies of childhood development. However, the theory has many critics regarding its failure to recognise hereditary factors and the influence of social and cultural development on the implications of attachment formation (Slater, 2007: Fitzgerald, 2021. One of the significant criticisms surrounding attachment theory is that there is an implication that babies will attach themselves to only one dominant figure, usually a mother figure, whereas studies have shown that babies can be securely attached to several key figures in their lives (Slater, 2007).…”
Section: Attachment Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attachment theory is often drawn on in studies of childhood development. However, the theory has many critics regarding its failure to recognise hereditary factors and the influence of social and cultural development on the implications of attachment formation (Slater, 2007: Fitzgerald, 2021. One of the significant criticisms surrounding attachment theory is that there is an implication that babies will attach themselves to only one dominant figure, usually a mother figure, whereas studies have shown that babies can be securely attached to several key figures in their lives (Slater, 2007).…”
Section: Attachment Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%