2019
DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2018.1558273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criticism strategies and their underlying cultural norms in online interactions: A study of native speakers of Persian and English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noticed that the speaker used a rhetorical statement to make the listener feel guilty. Hosseinizadeh and Rassaei (2019) stated that indirect communication style can also be explicated through high and low culture distinction. In an indirect communication style, direct communication of meaning is considered impolite; therefore, people tend to hide their true intention in order to be polite and save the hearer's face.…”
Section: Asking/presupposingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is noticed that the speaker used a rhetorical statement to make the listener feel guilty. Hosseinizadeh and Rassaei (2019) stated that indirect communication style can also be explicated through high and low culture distinction. In an indirect communication style, direct communication of meaning is considered impolite; therefore, people tend to hide their true intention in order to be polite and save the hearer's face.…”
Section: Asking/presupposingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since these speakers have a way to get along with the hearers, it is much easier for their criticism to be accepted. Furthermore, Hosseinizadeh and Rassaei (2019) suggested that whether the interaction is via media, online, or face-to-face can also play a part in determining the degree to which speakers adhere to culture schemas.…”
Section: Off Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies on criticizing have been conducted in both the written and oral modes of communication. In writing, a number of studies examined the evaluative language of book reviews (e.g., Araújo, 2012;Hyland, 2004;Itakura & Tsui, 2011), teachers' and peer feedback on students' work (e.g., Hyland & Hyland, 2001, 2006Lee, 2009) and criticism through electronic communication (e.g., Hosseinizadeh & Moqadam, 2019;Lü, 2018). As for oral communication, sample studies include analyses of televised talent competitions (Chen & Rau, 2015;Tang, 2016), teacher-student interaction (e.g., Cao, 2005;El-Dakhs, Ambreen, Zaheer, & Gusarova, 2019;Riekkinen, 2010) and the pragmatic competence of language learners (e.g., Nguyen, 2013Nguyen, , 2008aNguyen, , 2008b.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%