2015
DOI: 10.1111/dech.12183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critique, Rediscovery and Revival in Development Studies

Abstract: This article acts as the Introduction to the Debate that follows. It contends that the so‐called impasse in development has been a constant feature of the field and is an indicator of its self‐critical outlook rather than any deep‐seated existential crisis. It unpacks the various dimensions of ongoing debate regarding the future of development studies, probing its policy relevance and legitimacy, interdisciplinarity, geographic focus and relationship with post‐structuralist and Marxist thought. In order to rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis also contributes to a larger debate regarding the future relevance of development studies. As Arsel and Dasgupta (: 646) argue, development studies scholars have ‘shied away from making broad, structural claims about development’, to the point that the field now consists of ‘hard‐hitting yet sterile, repetitive and aprioristic critiques of neoliberal capitalism that document the plight of the poor and marginalized in the developing world, unwilling and unable to articulate a constructive agenda for development’. We respond to this call by moving beyond a critique of the evils of neoliberal change to show that critical responses that remobilize the state against neoliberal onslaughts can also produce and exacerbate the same effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis also contributes to a larger debate regarding the future relevance of development studies. As Arsel and Dasgupta (: 646) argue, development studies scholars have ‘shied away from making broad, structural claims about development’, to the point that the field now consists of ‘hard‐hitting yet sterile, repetitive and aprioristic critiques of neoliberal capitalism that document the plight of the poor and marginalized in the developing world, unwilling and unable to articulate a constructive agenda for development’. We respond to this call by moving beyond a critique of the evils of neoliberal change to show that critical responses that remobilize the state against neoliberal onslaughts can also produce and exacerbate the same effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is precisely my point: we cannot explain and conceptualize ‘development’ simply with reference to something else — in the case of Horner and Hulme, a general reference to certain geographies or statistics of development. As Arsel and Dasgupta (: 646) remark, what is required is ‘actually working out and empirically articulating the political economy relationships at work at a systemic level’. Through this, we can start to understand uneven development patterns at a deeper level and why they are occurring in relation to specific historical dynamics (Büscher, ).…”
Section: The Meaning Of (The Geography Of) Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is for this reason that contentious action such as those covered in our database are often referred to as "ecological distribution conflicts" and part of the global "environmental justice movement" (Martínez-Alier et al, 2016). Second, a class-based reading of "brown" cases challenges dominant readings of the connection between identity and environmentalism (Arsel & Dasgupta, 2015). More specifically, the dominant approach in the literature, despite oft-repeated disavowals of the trope of the "noble savage", has been reluctant to let go of the (often unspoken) expectation that indigenous and other local communities remain as the last barrier between nature and a rapacious global capital that can only perceive the Amazon through the lens of a profit motive, reducing all wealth to cash value.…”
Section: Brown Motives and "Environmental" Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%