2008
DOI: 10.1086/twc24045184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crocodiles and 'Inoculation' Reconsidered: De Quincey, Opium, and the Dream Object

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The over‐emphasis on the oriental threat could also, as John Barrell has argued, serve to diminish potentially dangerous differences between English classes or European nationalities by portraying these groups as unified in their difference from the oriental Other. Other scholars have approached the oriental threat of De Quincey’s dreams from a more psychological perspective; Thomas H. Schmid suggests that, for De Quincey, the true “pain” of opium is its “horrid inoculation…of incompatible natures” like human and crocodile, the crocodile being a De Quinceyan stand‐in for all things horrifyingly oriental (37). Schmid follows Grevel Lindop in pointing out that De Quincey uses “inoculation” in the eighteenth‐century sense of the word, meaning “the grafting of one botanical species upon another” (35).…”
Section: Oriental Childhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The over‐emphasis on the oriental threat could also, as John Barrell has argued, serve to diminish potentially dangerous differences between English classes or European nationalities by portraying these groups as unified in their difference from the oriental Other. Other scholars have approached the oriental threat of De Quincey’s dreams from a more psychological perspective; Thomas H. Schmid suggests that, for De Quincey, the true “pain” of opium is its “horrid inoculation…of incompatible natures” like human and crocodile, the crocodile being a De Quinceyan stand‐in for all things horrifyingly oriental (37). Schmid follows Grevel Lindop in pointing out that De Quincey uses “inoculation” in the eighteenth‐century sense of the word, meaning “the grafting of one botanical species upon another” (35).…”
Section: Oriental Childhoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%