2020
DOI: 10.1111/eve.13316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crooked tail carriage in horses: Increased prevalence in lame horses and those with thoracolumbar epaxial muscle tension or sacroiliac joint region pain

Abstract: Summary The relationship between lameness and crooked tail carriage (CTC) in horses is unclear. The objectives of this study were (i) to determine the association between CTC and lameness; (ii) among lame horses, to determine associations between CTC and lameness diagnosis, saddle slip, thoracolumbar range of motion (ROM), epaxial muscle tension and pain, and sacroiliac joint region (SIJR) pain, and (iii) to determine whether abolition of lameness and SIJR pain by diagnostic anaesthesia modified CTC. In this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, there was a higher frequency of occurrence of an intense stare for ≥5 s, repeated tail swishing, ears behind vertical for ≥5 s, repeated hindlimb toe drag, repeated exposure of the tongue, reluctance to go forwards and a crooked tail in the competitors in the current study compared with those competing in the WC competitions [ 10 ]. An association between crooked tail carriage and hindlimb lameness, epaxial muscle tension and sacroiliac joint region pain has previously been documented [ 16 ]. Repeated tail swishing was observed in the majority of competitors and is specifically mentioned in the FEI Dressage Rules as a ‘sign of nervousness, tension or resistance on the part of the Horse and must be taken into account by the Judges in their marks for every movement concerned, as well as in the collective mark’ [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there was a higher frequency of occurrence of an intense stare for ≥5 s, repeated tail swishing, ears behind vertical for ≥5 s, repeated hindlimb toe drag, repeated exposure of the tongue, reluctance to go forwards and a crooked tail in the competitors in the current study compared with those competing in the WC competitions [ 10 ]. An association between crooked tail carriage and hindlimb lameness, epaxial muscle tension and sacroiliac joint region pain has previously been documented [ 16 ]. Repeated tail swishing was observed in the majority of competitors and is specifically mentioned in the FEI Dressage Rules as a ‘sign of nervousness, tension or resistance on the part of the Horse and must be taken into account by the Judges in their marks for every movement concerned, as well as in the collective mark’ [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bilateral hindlimb toe drag may persist or develop after diagnostic anaesthesia of the hindlimbs. A crooked tail may persist despite improvement in gait (Dyson and Van Dijk 2020;Hibbs et al 2021). Crooked tail carriage was abolished in only 12% (20/164) horses in which hindlimb gait abnormalities were improved by diagnostic anaesthesia (Hibbs et al 2021).…”
Section: Factors That Can Potentially Influence the Rhpementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crooked tail carriage was abolished in only 12% (20/164) horses in which hindlimb gait abnormalities were improved by diagnostic anaesthesia (Hibbs et al . 2021).…”
Section: Factors That Can Potentially Influence the Rhpementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epaxial muscle hypertonicity was seen with greater frequency than epaxial muscle pain, as in a previous study (Hibbs et al . 2020), but was not significantly associated with tacking‐up or mounting behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Epaxial muscle pain, which was also a significant factor associated with tacking-up behaviour, predominated in the lumbar region, but was only seen in a small number of horses. It may be secondary to lameness or altered range of motion (Hibbs et al 2020), but was not significantly associated with tacking-up or mounting behaviour. Riding School horses were more likely to demonstrate a larger number of behaviours compared with General Purpose horses during both tacking-up and mounting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%