2016
DOI: 10.12944/cwe.11.2.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop Coefficient for Mulched Cotton Under Variable Irrigation Regimes

Abstract: Reduced cost of cultivation (30%) and increase in yield (40%) obliged the Saurashatra farmers to adopt Bt. Cotton on mass scale. Saurashtra cotton earns more profit at international market due to good luster, low naps, more wax on fibers surface, very low dye absorption. High evaporative conditions, scarcity of groundwater, and deficient rainfall condition are detrimental to cotton yields. Climatic change is adding another dimension to this complex nexus of soil-water-plant-atmosphere. Adverse environmental co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Penman-Monteith slightly underestimatedand Makkink and Priestly-Tailor models slightly overestimated the evapotranspiration. Contrary to it, Prajapati and Subbaiah (2019) found that adjusted FAO Kc overestimated evapotranspiration in Bt cotton in Junagadh. It suggested that local variability of meteorological conditions is important for estimation of reference evapotranspiration by different models.…”
Section: Comparison Of Estimated Evapotranspiration Derived From Different Methodscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Penman-Monteith slightly underestimatedand Makkink and Priestly-Tailor models slightly overestimated the evapotranspiration. Contrary to it, Prajapati and Subbaiah (2019) found that adjusted FAO Kc overestimated evapotranspiration in Bt cotton in Junagadh. It suggested that local variability of meteorological conditions is important for estimation of reference evapotranspiration by different models.…”
Section: Comparison Of Estimated Evapotranspiration Derived From Different Methodscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The use of flood irrigation, which has a poor water use efficiency (35-40%), is the main cause of the inadequate irrigation coverage . One of the main factors limiting irrigation coverage is the prevalent use of flood irrigation, which uses water inefficiently (Prajapati and Subbaiah, 2015;Prajapati et al, 2016). Because of significant conveyance and distribution losses, estimates of water use efficiency under the flood irrigation range from 35 to 40% (Rosegrant, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%